By following a professional development project focusing on enhancing assessment competence amongst teachers, the current study examines how teachers use reflective writing and systematic discussions as tools for developing professional competence in assessment. More specifically, the paper aims at identifying conditions which influence and facilitate reflection over time. The study was a small scale qualitative study, and the analysis draws on nine teachers' written and oral reflections. The findings suggest that it is possible to identify three closely connected development phases; describing, explaining, and exploring the level of action. By studying the reflection processes throughout these three phases the paper illuminates various aspects of reflection as a tool in teachers' professional development.
It is commonly known and accepted that feedback has a significant effect on learning and that it is a wise investment in the education system to develop good strategies for assessment involving informative feedback. However, despite the effort put into professional development programmes for teachers and despite teachers working with the recommended didactic approaches to assessment, students still sometimes miss out on intended learning. The current study aims to uncover different types of communicative interaction involving feedback. Through a qualitative analysis of observation notes and video, it was possible to distinguish four typical categories of feedback. The common arenas for formative assessment dialogue are identified and typical actions that are taken by the students and the teachers in the different interactional situations are discussed. The findings imply that knowledge and awareness of the context in which the interaction is played out is important for understanding how students relate to feedback.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.