No abstract

We devise a general result on the consistency of model-based bootstrap methods for U -and Vstatistics under easily verifiable conditions. For that purpose, we derive the limit distributions of degree-2 degenerate U -and V -statistics for weakly dependent R d -valued random variables first. To this end, only some moment conditions and smoothness assumptions concerning the kernel are required. Based on this result, we verify that the bootstrap counterparts of these statistics have the same limit distributions. Finally, some applications to hypothesis testing are presented.

We derive the asymptotic distributions of degenerate U -and V -statistics of stationary and ergodic random variables. Statistics of these types naturally appear as approximations of test statistics. Since the limit variables are of complicated structure, typically depending on unknown parameters, quantiles can hardly be obtained directly. Therefore, we prove a general result on the consistency of model-based bootstrap methods for U -and V -statistics under easily verifiable conditions. Three applications to hypothesis testing are presented. Finally, the finite sample behavior of the bootstrapbased tests is illustrated by a simulation study.

In this paper, we propose a model-free bootstrap method for the empirical process under absolute regularity. More precisely, consistency of an adapted version of the so-called dependent wild bootstrap, that was introduced by Shao (2010) and is very easy to implement, is proved under minimal conditions on the tuning parameter of the procedure. We apply our results to construct confidence intervals for unknown parameters and to approximate critical values for statistical tests. A simulation study shows that our method is competitive to standard block bootstrap methods in finite samples.

Abstract. Sample quantiles are consistent estimators for the true quantile and satisfy central limit theorems (CLTs) if the underlying distribution is continuous. If the distribution is discrete, the situation is much more delicate. In this case, sample quantiles are known to be not even consistent in general for the population quantiles. In a motivating example, we show that Efron's bootstrap does not consistently mimic the distribution of sample quantiles even in the discrete independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) data case. To overcome this bootstrap inconsistency, we provide two different and complementing strategies.In the first part of this paper, we prove that m-out-of-n-type bootstraps do consistently mimic the distribution of sample quantiles in the discrete data case. As the corresponding bootstrap confidence intervals tend to be conservative due to the discreteness of the true distribution, we propose randomization techniques to construct bootstrap confidence sets of asymptotically correct size.In the second part, we consider a continuous modification of the cumulative distribution function and make use of mid-quantiles studied in Ma, Genton and Parzen (2011). Contrary to ordinary quantiles and due to continuity, mid-quantiles lose their discrete nature and can be estimated consistently. Moreover, Ma, Genton and Parzen (2011) proved (non-)central limit theorems for i.i.d. data, which we generalize to the time series case. However, as the mid-quantile function fails to be differentiable, classical i.i.d. or block bootstrap methods do not lead to completely satisfactory results and m-out-of-n variants are required here as well.The finite sample performances of both approaches are illustrated in a simulation study by comparing coverage rates of bootstrap confidence intervals.