Background
Two-thirds of children with tuberculosis have non-severe disease.
Method
SHINE was an open-label treatment-shortening non-inferiority trial in children with non-severe, symptomatic, presumed drug-susceptible, smear-negative tuberculosis, in Uganda, Zambia, South Africa and India. Children aged <16 years were randomised to 16- versus 24-week standard first-line anti-tuberculosis treatment using WHO-recommended paediatric fixed-dose-combinations and a non-inferiority margin of 6% was used. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of treatment failure, anti-tuberculosis treatment changes/restarts, on-treatment loss-to-follow-up, TB recurrence or death by 72 weeks, excluding children not reaching 16 weeks follow-up (modified-intent-to-treat). Primary safety outcome was on-treatment grade ≥3 adverse events.
Results
1204 children (602 in each group) were enrolled between July 2016 and July 2018; median age 3.5 years (range 2 months-15 years), 52% male, 11% HIV-infected, 14% bacteriologically-confirmed tuberculosis. Retention by 72 weeks and adherence to allocated anti-tuberculosis treatment were 95% and 94%, respectively. Sixteen (3%) versus 18 (3%) children reached the primary efficacy outcome in 16- versus 24-week arms respectively: unadjusted difference -0.4%, 95% CI (-2.2, 1.5). Non-inferiority of 16-weeks was consistent across intention-to-treat, per-protocol and key secondary analyses including when restricting analysis to the 958 (80%) children independently adjudicated to have tuberculosis at baseline. 95 (8%) children experienced grade ≥3 adverse events, including 17 adverse reactions (11 hepatic, all except three occurred within first 8 weeks, when treatment arms were the same).
Conclusions
4-months anti-tuberculosis treatment was non-inferior to 6 months for children treated for drug-susceptible non-severe smear-negative tuberculosis.
(Supported by University College London; Trial Registration: ISRCTN 63579542)
Patients with myelodysplasia are at a higher risk for SSIs after spinal fusion. Optimal antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce the risk of infection, especially in high-risk patients such as those with myelodysplasia or those undergoing fusion involving the sacral area.
Background
Tuberculosis (TB) continues to result in high morbidity and mortality in children from resource-limited settings. Diagnostic challenges, including resource-intense sputum collection methods and insensitive diagnostic tests, contribute to diagnostic delay and poor outcomes in children. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of stool Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) compared with bacteriologic confirmation (combination of Xpert and culture of respiratory samples).
Methods
In a hospital-based study in Cape Town, South Africa, we enrolled children younger than 13 years of age with suspected pulmonary TB from April 2012- August 2015. Standard clinical investigations included tuberculin skin test, chest radiograph and HIV testing. Respiratory samples for smear microscopy, Xpert and liquid culture included gastric aspirates, induced sputum, nasopharyngeal aspirates and expectorated sputum. One stool sample per child was collected and tested using Xpert.
Results
Of 379 children enrolled (median age, 15.9 months, 13.7% HIV-infected), 73 (19.3%) had bacteriologically confirmed TB. The sensitivity and specificity of stool Xpert vs. overall bacteriologic confirmation were 31.9% (95% CI 21.84-44.50%) and 99.7% (95% CI 98.2-100%) respectively. 23/51 (45.1%) children with bacteriologically confirmed TB with severe disease were stool Xpert positive. Cavities on chest radiograph were associated with Xpert stool positivity regardless of age and other relevant factors (OR 7.05; 95% CI 2.16-22.98; p=0.001).
Conclusions
Stool Xpert can rapidly confirm TB in children who present with radiologic findings suggestive of severe TB. In resource-limited settings where children frequently present with advanced disease, Xpert on stool samples could improve access to rapid diagnostic confirmation and appropriate treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.