An historical cohort study was conducted to investigate the rate and extent of neurological recovery in obstetric brachial plexus injury (OBPI) and to identify possible prognostic factors in a cohort of children with OBPI from birth to 7 years. All children (n=56; 31 females, 25 males) with OBPI were evaluated at fixed time intervals by one examiner. They underwent a final neurological examination at a mean age of 3 years 10 months (range 1 to 7 years). Neurological outcome was not as favourable as is often reported: complete neurological recovery occurred in 37 out of 56 children (66%). In half of these there was delayed recovery, in which case complete neurological recovery was assessed from 1.5 to 16 months of age (median age 6.5 months, SD 4.2 months). External rotation and supination were the last to recover and recovered the least. Although biceps function at three months was considered to be the best indicator for operative treatment, external rotation and supination were found to be better in predicting eventual complete recovery. Initial symptoms directly post partum were not found to be prognostic. Functional outcome was mainly reported to be good.
An historical cohort study was conducted to investigate the rate and extent of neurological recovery in obstetric brachial plexus injury (OBPI) and to identify possible prognostic factors in a cohort of children with OBPI from birth to 7 years. All children (n=56; 31 females, 25 males) with OBPI were evaluated at fixed time intervals by one examiner. They underwent a final neurological examination at a mean age of 3 years 10 months (range 1 to 7 years). Neurological outcome was not as favourable as is often reported: complete neurological recovery occurred in 37 out of 56 children (66%). In half of these there was delayed recovery, in which case complete neurological recovery was assessed from 1.5 to 16 months of age (median age 6.5 months, SD 4.2 months). External rotation and supination were the last to recover and recovered the least. Although biceps function at three months was considered to be the best indicator for operative treatment, external rotation and supination were found to be better in predicting eventual complete recovery. Initial symptoms directly post partum were not found to be prognostic. Functional outcome was mainly reported to be good.
Context: Goal-setting is a key characteristic of modern rehabilitation. However, goals need to be meaningful and of importance to the client. Axioms: Both theories and empirical evidence support the importance of a hierarchy of goals: one or more overall goals that clients find personally meaningful and specific goals that are related to the overall goals. We posit that the client’s fundamental beliefs, goals and attitudes (“global meaning”) need to be explored before setting any rehabilitation goal. A chaplain or other person with similar skills can be involved in doing so in an open-ended way. The client’s fundamental beliefs, goals and attitudes serve as a point of departure for setting rehabilitation goals. Setting goals: We set out a three-stage process to set goals: (1) exploring the client’s global meaning (i.e. fundamental beliefs, goals and attitudes), (2) deriving a meaningful overall rehabilitation goal from the client’s global meaning and (3) setting specific rehabilitation goals that serve to achieve the meaningful overall rehabilitation goal. Conclusion: This is an extension of current practice in many rehabilitation teams, which may help counter the drive toward exclusively functional goals based around independence.
There is no consensus on the cause of contractures and bony deformities in children with OBPI. Conservative methods of treatment have changed over the years, without research on the outcome of these treatment changes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.