Functional neurological disorder is a common and phenomenologically diverse condition. Resultant disability is caused by both the dominant clinical presentation, e.g. paralysis or tremor and additional symptomatology such as cognitive symptoms. Recently the similarity of neuropsychiatric profiles across a range of functional syndromes has been highlighted. This is suggestive of a common underlying mechanism with a theoretical deficit of information processing proposed. Identification of an experimental biomarker for such deficits could offer novel assessment and therapeutic strategies. In this study, we took the temporal discrimination threshold as a paradigm that can be used to model sensory processing in functional movement disorders. Our hypothesis was that we would be able to delineate markers of slowed information processing in this paradigm removed from the phenomenological presentation with a movement disorder. We recorded both response accuracy and reaction time in a two-choice temporal resolution/discrimination task in 36 patients with functional movement disorders and 36 control subjects. A psychometric function was fitted to accuracy data for each individual revealing both abnormally high threshold values (P = 0.0053) and shallow psychometric slopes in patients (P = 0.0015). Patients with functional movement disorders also had significantly slower response times (P = 0.0065). We then used a well-established model for decision-making (the drift diffusion model) that uses both response accuracy and reaction time data to estimate mechanistic physiological dimensions of decision-making and sensory processing. This revealed pathologically reduced drift rate in the patient group, a parameter that quantifies the quality and rate of information accumulation within this sensory task (P = 0.002). We discuss how the deficits we observed in patients with functional movement disorders are likely to stem from abnormal allocation of attention that impairs the quality of sensory information available. Within a predictive coding framework sensory information could be down-weighted in favour of predictions encoded by the prior. Our results therefore offer a parsimonious account for a range of experimental and clinical findings. Reduced drift rate is a potential experimental marker for a generalized deficit in information processing across functional disorders that allows diverse symptomatology to be quantified under a common disease framework.
Introduction: Medical treatments have limited long-term effect in task-specific dystonia. Whilst evidence supports the use of rehabilitation, no randomised controlled trials have been undertaken. This small-scale study determined the feasibility of implementing and evaluating a mixed sensory-motor task-specific dystonia rehabilitative programme. Methods: Participants with writer's or musician's dystonia were recruited from a movement disorder and hand therapy clinic. Feasibility measures were recruitment rate, retention, session attendance, adherence to exercises. Self-report measures at 0, 3 and 6 months included: Arm Dystonia Disability Scale (ADDS), Tubiana and Chamagne Scale (TCS), Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), Health Status (EQ-5D 5L), Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI). Task performance was video-recorded at baseline and 6 months. At 6 months, interviews explored participant experiences of the intervention. Results: Fifteen patients were recruited over 6 months (rate 2.5/month, musician's dystonia ¼ 8, writer's dystonia ¼ 7). Complete data sets were collected for twelve people(80%). The programme comprised a maximum six sessions plus daily home exercises. Nine completed the home programme at 75%. No adverse events were reported. Effect sizes at 3 and 6 months, respectively, were ADDS 3-month ¼ 0.28, 6-month ¼ 0.23; TCS 3-month ¼ 0.13, 6-month ¼ 0.53; BIPQ 3-month ¼ 0.38, 6-month ¼ 0.71; EQ-5D-5L 3-month ¼ 0.34, 6-month ¼ 0.59; video analysis at 6 months ¼ 0.78. Eleven (92%) improved on the CGI. Interviews supported acceptability of the intervention. Conclusions: This intervention was feasible to deliver with high retention, adherence and acceptability. Improvements occurred across measures. This informs the development of future randomised controlled trials.
No abstract
Recently the similarity of neuropsychiatric profiles across a range of functional syndromes has been high- lighted. This is suggestive of a common underlying mechanism with a theoretical deficit of information processing proposed. In this study, we took the temporal discrimination threshold, as a paradigm that can be used to model sensory processing in functional movement disorders. Our hypothesis was that we would be able to delineate markers of slowed information processing in this paradigm removed from the phenomenological presentation with a movement disorder. We recorded both response accuracy and reaction time in a two choice temporal resolution/discrimination task in 36 patients with functional movement disorders and 36 controls. We used a well-established model for decision-making (the drift diffusion model) to estimate mechanistic physiological dimensions of decision-making and sensory pro- cessing. This revealed pathologically reduced drift rate in the patient group, a parameter that quantifies the quality and rate of information accumulation within this sensory task (p=0.002). We discuss how the deficits we observed in patients with functional movement disorders are likely to stem from abnormal allocation of attention that impairs the quality of sensory information available. Within a predictive coding framework sensory information could be down-weighted in favour of predictions encoded by the prior. Our results therefore offer a parsimonious account for a range of experimental and clinical findings.asadnick@sgul.ac.uk
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.