Studying plant stress responses is an important issue in a world threatened by global warming. Unfortunately, comparative analyses are hampered by varying experimental setups. In contrast, the AtGenExpress abiotic stress experiment displays intercomparability. Importantly, six of the nine stresses (wounding, genotoxic, oxidative, UV-B light, osmotic and salt) can be examined for their capacity to generate systemic signals between the shoot and root, which might be essential to regain homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana. We classified the systemic responses into two groups: genes that are regulated in the non-treated tissue only are defined as type I responsive and, accordingly, genes that react in both tissues are termed type II responsive. Analysis of type I and II systemic responses suggest distinct functionalities, but also significant overlap between different stresses. Comparison with salicylic acid (SA) and methyl-jasmonate (MeJA) responsive genes implies that MeJA is involved in the systemic stress response. Certain genes are predominantly responding in only one of the categories, e.g., WRKY genes respond mainly non-systemically. Instead, genes of the plant core environmental stress response (PCESR), e.g., ZAT10, ZAT12, ERD9 or MES9, are part of different response types. Moreover, several PCESR genes switch between the categories in a stress-specific manner.

The transition to reproduction is a crucial step in the life cycle of any organism. In Arabidopsis thaliana the establishment of reproductive growth can be divided into two phases: Firstly, cauline leaves with axillary meristems are formed and internode elongation begins. Secondly, lateral meristems develop into flowers with defined organs. Floral shoots are usually determinate and suppress the development of lateral shoots. Here, we describe a transposon insertion mutant in the Nossen accession with defects in floral development and growth. Most strikingly is the outgrowth of stems from the axillary bracts of the primary flower carrying secondary flowers. Therefore, we named this mutant flower-in-flower (fif ). However, the transposon insertion in the annotated gene is not the cause for the fif phenotype. By means of classical and genome sequencing-based mapping, the mutation responsible for the fif phenotype was found to be in the LEAFY gene. The mutation, a G-to-A exchange in the second exon of LEAFY, creates a novel lfy allele and results in a cysteine-to-tyrosine exchange in the α1-helix of LEAFY's DNA-binding domain. This exchange abolishes target DNA-binding, whereas subcellular localization and homomerization are not affected. To explain the strong fif phenotype against these molecular findings, several hypotheses are discussed. of 16intermediate between floral and vegetative shoots. The cloning of the corresponding genes revealed the existence of the master regulators required for the floral initiation process. To date, five regulatory master genes are known: LEAFY (LFY), APETALA1 (AP1), CAULIFLOWER (CAL), APETALA2 (AP2) and UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS (UFO) [3]. LFY and AP1 play a primary role in initiating the floral program, as the corresponding loss-of-function mutants do not generate shoots with floral characteristics and the ectopic expression of either gene induces precocious flower formation [9][10][11]. LFY, AP1 and CAL encode for transcription factors and are expressed predominantly in floral primordia [12][13][14].During plant vegetative growth, LFY expression increases in newly formed leaves until a certain threshold is reached [15]. LFY then induces the expression of AP1/CAL genes by activation of the AP1/CAL promoters. Through their mutual transcriptional up-regulation, LFY and AP1/CAL cooperate to cause the floral transition [16,17]. Once the floral meristem is established, the floral initiation gene functions govern its spatial patterning by inducing the expression of the floral homeotic ABC genes, such as AP2, AP3, Pistillata (PI) and AGAMOUS (AG). The ABC gene functions in turn control the identity of the stereotypically arranged Arabidopsis floral organs [18,19].In the course of our study of the influence of abiotic stress on flower symmetry, we searched for novel insertion mutants with defects in floral development or morphology in different Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. We focused on genes that had not yet been linked to flowering. A Ds transposon insertion mutant, which developed secon...

The transition to reproduction is a crucial step in the life cycle of any organism. In Arabidopsis thaliana the establishment of reproductive growth can be divided into two phases: In the first phase, cauline leaves with axillary meristems are formed and internode elongation begins. In the second phase, lateral meristems develop into flowers with defined organs. Floral shoots are usually determinate and suppress the development of lateral shoots. Here, we describe a Ds transposon insertion mutant in the Nossen (No-0) accession with severe defects in floral development and flower morphology. The most striking aspect is the outgrowth of stems from the axillary bracts of the primary flower carrying terminal secondary flowers. Therefore, we named this mutant flower-in-flower (fif). However, the insertion of the transposon in the annotated gene is not responsible for the fif phenotype. By means of classical and genome sequencing-based mapping, the mutation responsible for the fif phenotype was found to be in the LEAFY (LFY) gene. The mutation, a G-to-A exchange in the second exon of LFY, creates a novel lfy allele and causes a cysteine-to-tyrosine exchange in the α1-helix of the LFY DNA-binding domain.Whereas subcellular localization and homomerization are not affected, the DNAbinding of LFY FIF is abolished. We propose that the amino acid exchange interferes with the cooperative binding of LFY to its target DNA. To generate the strong fif phenotype, LFY FIF may act dominant-negatively by either forming non-binding LFY/LFY FIF heteromers or by titrating out the interaction partners, required for LFY function as transcription factor.

Conformational change of the β2 integrin lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1) is an early marker of T cell activation. A protocol using the mAb clone m24 recognizing the active, extended high-affinity conformation has been previously described for the assessment of functional CD4 + and CD8 + T cells in response to MHC-peptide stimulation. We investigated the applicability of the m24 mAb to detect the activation of γδ T cells in response to different soluble and immobilized stimuli. m24 mAb staining was associated with the expression of cytokines and was detectable as early as 10 min after stimulation, but with different kinetics depending on the nature of the stimulus. Hence, we conclude that this assay is suitable for the detection of functional γδ T cells and allows the assessment of activation more rapidly than alternative methods such as cytokine detection. Intracellular staining, protein trafficking inhibitors, or prior knowledge of the stimulating moiety recognized are no longer required for monitoring γδ T cell activation.

The transition to reproduction is a crucial step in the life cycle of any organism. In Arabidopsis thaliana the establishment of reproductive growth can be divided into two phases: Firstly, cauline leaves with axillary meristems are formed and internode elongation begins. Secondly, lateral meristems develop into flowers with defined organs. Floral shoots are usually determinate and suppress the development of lateral shoots. Here, we describe a transposon insertion mutant in the Nossen accession with defects in floral development and growth. Most strikingly is the outgrowth of stems from the axillary bracts of the primary flower carrying secondary flowers. Therefore, we named this mutant flower-in-flower (fif). However, the transposon insertion in the annotated gene is not the cause for the fif phenotype. By means of classical and genome sequencing-based mapping, the mutation responsible for the fif phenotype was found to be in the LEAFY gene. The mutation, a G-to-A exchange in the second exon of LEAFY, creates a novel lfy allele and results in a cysteine-to-tyrosine exchange in the α1-helix of LEAFY´s DNA-binding domain. This exchange abolishes target DNA-binding, whereas subcellular localization and homomerization are not affected. To explain the strong fif phenotype against this molecular findings, several hypotheses are discussed.