Many variables may influence success rates after intrauterine insemination (IUI), including sperm quality in the native and washed semen sample. A literature search was performed to investigate the threshold levels of sperm parameters above which IUI pregnancy outcome is significantly improved and/or the cut-off values reaching substantial discriminative performance in an IUI programme. A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library revealed a total of 983 papers. Only 55 studies (5.6%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and these papers were analysed. Sperm parameters most frequently examined were: (i) inseminating motile count after washing: cut-off value between 0.8 and 5 million; (ii) sperm morphology using strict criteria: cut-off value ⩾5% normal morphology; (iii) total motile sperm count in the native sperm sample: cut-off value of 5-10 million; and (iv) total motility in the native sperm sample: threshold value of 30%. The results indicate a lack of prospective studies, a lack of standardization in semen testing methodology and a huge heterogeneity of patient groups and IUI treatment strategies. More prospective cohort trials and prospective randomized trials investigating the predictive value of semen parameters on IUI outcome are urgently needed. It is generally believed that intrauterine insemination (IUI) with homologous semen should be a first-choice treatment to more invasive and expensive techniques of assisted reproduction in cases of cervical, unexplained and moderate male factor subfertility. The rationale for the use of artificial insemination is to increase gamete density at the site of fertilization. Scientific validation of this strategy is difficult because literature is rather confusing and inconclusive. Many variables may influence success rates after IUI treatment procedures. It seems logical that sperm quality has to be one of the main determinants to predict IUI success. Clinical practice would benefit from the establishment of threshold levels for sperm parameters above which IUI pregnancy outcome is significantly improved and below which a successful outcome is unlikely. We performed a literature search to investigate if such threshold levels are known. Most striking were the lack of standardization in semen-testing methodology and the huge heterogeneity of patient groups and IUI treatment strategies. The four sperm parameters most frequently examined were: (i) inseminating motile count after washing: cut-off value between 0.8 and 5 million; (ii) sperm morphology using strict criteria: cut-off value >4% normal morphology; (iii) total motile sperm count in native sperm sample: cut-off value of 5-10 million; and (iv) total motility in native sperm sample: threshold value of 30%. This review identified an urgent need for more and better prospective cohort trials investigating the predictive value of semen parameters on IUI pregnancy rate.

The aim was to examine the value of different covariates in the prediction of intrauterine insemination (IUI) success. Between July 2011 and September 2015, data from 1401 IUI cycles with homologous semen in 556 couples were collected prospectively, by questionnaire, in a tertiary referral infertility centre. Statistical analysis was performed using generalized estimating equations (GEEs). GEEs were used instead of an ordinary logistic regression model to take into account the correlation between observations from the same person. The primary outcome parameter was clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), confirmed with a gestational sac and fetal heartbeat on ultrasonography at 7-8 weeks. An overall CPR of 9.5% per cycle was observed. Univariate statistical analysis revealed female and male age, male smoking, female body mass index, ovarian stimulation and inseminating motile count (IMC) as covariates significantly influencing CPR per cycle. Multivariate GEE analysis revealed that the only valuable prognostic covariates included female age, male smoking and infertility status (i.e. primary/secondary infertility). IMC showed a significant curvilinear relationship, with first an increase and then a decrease in pregnancy rate.

The wish to receive and donate information depends on the characteristics and beliefs of the candidate donors. Also, the donor's characteristics were linked to the acceptance of meeting the offspring in the future: the donors with a partner and donors who said they would donate without financial reimbursement were less willing to meet the donor offspring.