Frontotemporal dementia (FTD), marked by impairments in behavior, language and sometimes motor function, is a common form of early-onset dementia 1 . Approximately 20-30% of FTD is caused by autosomal dominant mutations (familial, or f-FTD), usually in one of three genes: chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72), progranulin (GRN) or microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) 2 . FTD is uniformly fatal, and there are no approved therapies; however, a growing number of new treatments targeting C9orf72, GRN and MAPT are moving into clinical trials 3,4 . Experience from Alzheimer's disease (AD), spinal muscular Temporal order of clinical and biomarker changes in familial frontotemporal dementia

Introduction Remote smartphone assessments of cognition, speech/language, and motor functioning in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) could enable decentralized clinical trials and improve access to research. We studied the feasibility and acceptability of remote smartphone data collection in FTD research using the ALLFTD Mobile App (ALLFTD‐mApp). Methods A diagnostically mixed sample of 214 participants with FTD or from familial FTD kindreds (asymptomatic: CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0 [ N = 101]; prodromal: 0.5 [ N = 49]; symptomatic ≥1 [ N = 51]; not measured [ N = 13]) were asked to complete ALLFTD‐mApp tests on their smartphone three times within 12 days. They completed smartphone familiarity and participation experience surveys. Results It was feasible for participants to complete the ALLFTD‐mApp on their own smartphones. Participants reported high smartphone familiarity, completed ∼ 70% of tasks, and considered the time commitment acceptable (98% of respondents). Greater disease severity was associated with poorer performance across several tests. Discussion These findings suggest that the ALLFTD‐mApp study protocol is feasible and acceptable for remote FTD research. HIGHLIGHTS The ALLFTD Mobile App is a smartphone‐based platform for remote, self‐administered data collection. The ALLFTD Mobile App consists of a comprehensive battery of surveys and tests of executive functioning, memory, speech and language, and motor abilities. Remote digital data collection using the ALLFTD Mobile App was feasible in a multicenter research consortium that studies FTD. Data was collected in healthy controls and participants with a range of diagnoses, particularly FTD spectrum disorders. Remote digital data collection was well accepted by participants with a variety of diagnoses.

Background In preparation for treatment trials in frontotemporal dementia (FTD), sensitive assessments to detect early clinical deficits and track longitudinal changes are needed. Remote digital data collection using smartphones may improve sensitivity to detect and follow abnormalities by allowing novel methods of data capture and more frequent assessments. Furthermore, remote evaluations can reduce patient and staff burden. Despite these benefits, little is known about the reliability and validity of self‐administered cognitive testing completed on smartphones. Method We investigated self‐administered smartphone cognitive tests from the ALLFTD Mobile App in a mixed sample of 45 participants, including 10 functionally intact older adults, 24 participants from families harboring pathogenic FTD mutations (asymptomatic n=14; mildly symptomatic n=10;), and 11 symptomatic FTD‐spectrum participants. A subset (n=15) was missing CDR®+NACC‐FTLD data but consensus diagnoses were available. Participants were asked to complete five tests that were repeated three times over eight days. Tests included versions of N‐back, Stroop, Flanker, and Go/No‐Go paradigms, and an adaptive spatial working memory test. Reliability was assessed using split‐half reliability (first testing session, 100 simulations) and intraclass correlations (ICC) across the three testing sessions. Linear models were fitted to evaluate the association of test performance with age and disease severity (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD Global and Box Scores), covarying for sex and education level. Models evaluating age associations excluded symptomatic participants. Result Participants completed 72.4% of available instruments. Split‐half reliability (range: 0.76 to 0.97) and ICCs (0.70 to 0.92) suggested adequate‐to‐excellent internal consistency and test‐retest reliability. Across the five tests, negative associations were observed with CDR®+NACC‐FTLD Box Scores (ßs = ‐0.24 to ‐0.77), and in clinically asymptomatic individuals, negative associations were observed with age (ßs = ‐0.43 to ‐0.88). Performance on all measures was worse in symptomatic participants compared to asymptomatic (p‐values<.05). Mildly symptomatic cases (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD=0.5) performed worse on Stroop, Flanker, and spatial working memory than asymptomatic participants (p‐values<.03). Flanker and Stroop tasks consistently showed the strongest reliability and validity findings. Conclusion Smartphone adaptations of common neuropsychological tests produced promising preliminary results. Strong associations with disease severity and age suggest these metrics may be valid for detecting clinically relevant cognitive changes, even in mildly symptomatic FTD.

BackgroundFrontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a collection of neurodegenerative diseases affecting behavior, cognition, and motor functions. FTD treatment trials will benefit from sensitive assessments capable of detecting and longitudinally tracking cognitive changes. Remote smartphone cognitive tests may improve the sensitivity to detect and monitor cognitive decline via novel methods of data capture and more frequent assessments within ecologically valid environments, while simultaneously reducing patient burden. The first step in determining the utility of these measures is establishing their reliability. We previously reported baseline reliability estimates for the ALLFTD Mobile App cognitive tests in a small pilot sample. Here we extend these results using a larger sample and evaluate six‐month stability.MethodWe enrolled a diagnostically mixed sample of 128 participants (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0 [n = 84]; CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0.5 [n = 21]; CDR®+NACC‐FTLD≥1 [n = 23]) from ongoing studies of healthy aging (Hillblom Network) and frontotemporal dementia (ALLFTD). Participants self‐administered five cognitive tests from the ALLFTD Mobile App on their own smartphone; they were asked to complete each test three times within two weeks. Tests included gamified versions of N‐back, Stroop, Flanker, and Go/No‐Go paradigms, and an adaptive short‐term memory test. We evaluated the internal consistency of each test’s first occurrence using Spearman‐Brown split‐half reliability (100 simulations). Test‐retest reliability over the first three baseline replicates (as available) was evaluated by calculating intraclass correlations (ICC). In a preliminary analysis, we tested the six‐month stability of test performance in nine functionally intact participants who completed baseline and follow‐up Flanker, N‐Back, and adaptive memory assessments by calculating Spearman’s rho.ResultSplit‐half reliability estimates were in the good to excellent range (r’s: 0.81–0.97). Test‐retest reliability estimates were in the adequate to excellent range (ICCs: 0.72–0.96). ICC estimates were comparable for participants with and without clinical impairment (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0 (0.74–0.95) and CDR®+NACC‐FTLD >0 (0.67–0.95). Among functionally intact individuals, baseline and 6‐months scores were highly correlated (r’s: 0.76–0.93, p’s<.05).ConclusionOur findings of adequate to excellent internal consistency, test‐retest reliability, and 6‐month stability support the feasibility of remote, smartphone‐based cognitive testing among a diagnostically mixed sample typical of healthy aging and frontotemporal dementia research studies.

Background The ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) study is designed to characterize both sporadic and familial FTLD (f‐FTLD) through annual detailed clinical, neuropsychological, biomarker, and neuroimaging assessments to capture disease onset and trajectory in preparation for therapeutic trails in FTLD. Transitions from asymptomatic to mild disease, or from mild to overt, may reveal critical windows for intervention. Method 169 f‐FTLD participants carrying mutations in the main FTLD‐associated genes (79 C9orf72; 37 GRN; 53 MAPT) with at least two clinical assessments were included for analysis of phenoconversion from asymptomatic or mild disease. [CDRÒ + NACC FTLD global scores (Miyagawa et al, 2020) were used to define baseline status at first visit: “asymptomatic” = 0 and “mild” = 0.5. Conversion was defined as “partial” (asymptomatic to mild), “definite” (asymptomatic to overt [CDRÒ + NACC FTLD > = 1) and “mild to overt” (0.5 to > = 1). Result Definite conversion occurred most often in MAPT mutation carriers, with 5/43 asymptomatic carriers transitioning through mild to overt across multiple visits. Definite conversion was also seen in 2/65 C9orf72 expansion carriers and 1/30 GRN mutation carriers. All definite converters were assessed as mild (CDRÒ + NACC FTLD = 0.5) for at least one intermediate visit; definite conversion was observed from 2‐4 years from initial assessment. Partial conversions also occurred in all three genetic groups (MAPT: 6; C9orf72: 5; GRN: 5). Further conversion is expected to be observed in these participants in additional follow‐up visits. C9orf72 expansion carriers were less likely to progress from a baseline of mild to overt (3/14) than GRN carriers (4/6) or MAPT (7/10). Conclusion Longitudinal assessment through natural history studies can capture early phenoconversion in carriers of FTLD‐associated genetic mutations; corresponding imaging, cognitive, and biomarker profiles captured may provide insights into disease mechanisms and trajectories.