The assessment of clinical competence remains almost universally accepted in the nurse education literature as a laudable pursuit yet there are aspects of it that remain at odds with the higher education of nurses.
This study evaluated the acceptability of a supportive model of follow‐up. One hundred and twelve women recovering from breast cancer were randomised to receive standard breast clinic aftercare (Control n = 56) or on demand by open access aftercare by breast care nurses (Intervention n = 56). Participants attended a support‐based psycho‐educational programme delivered in four half‐day group sessions. Three quality of life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ‐C30, QLQ‐BR23, HADS) were administered at baseline and 6‐monthly intervals for 2 years. Multilevel linear regression modelling methods were used for evaluation. Age was found to be a statistically significant predictor of quality of life in several sub‐scales. Increasing age was negatively associated with sexual functioning, systematic therapy side effects and physical functioning, and positively associated with future perspective. Aftercare assignment was not found to be a statistically significant predictor. Women treated for early breast cancer were not disadvantaged by allocation to the open access supportive care model in terms of quality of life experienced. The model for follow‐up was demonstrated to be a feasible alternative to routinised hospital‐based follow‐up and adds to the evidence for stratified follow‐up for low‐risk cancer patients, incorporating self‐management education. Stratified follow‐up pathways are viewed as a preferable approach.
Aims
The aim of this study was to explore how registered nurses manage and deliver care to patients admitted to medical wards and Medical Assessment Units with complications of drug use and to elicit the experiences and views of those receiving that care.
Background
Illicit drug use is a major public health problem worldwide. The physical complications of problem drug use often result in admission to medical wards. Registered nurses working in these settings have been reported as possessing negative attitudes towards patients who use illicit drugs and lacking preparation to provide problem drug use–related care needs.
Design
Grounded theory.
Methods
A grounded theory approach was used to collect and analyse 41 semi‐structured interviews. Data collection and analysis were undertaken in nine medical wards in the Northwest of England in 2008. A combination of purposive and theoretical sampling was adopted to recruit registered nurses (n = 29) and medical ward patients (n = 12) admitted for physical complications of problem drug use. Data were subjected to constant comparative analysis.
Findings
Two sub‐categories emerged: ‘Lack of knowledge to care’ and ‘Distrust and detachment’ and these formed the core category ‘Dissonant care’. The combination of lack of educational preparation, negative attitudes and experience of conflict, aggression, and untrustworthiness appeared to affect negatively the nurse–patient relationship.
Conclusions
This study illuminated interplay of factors that complicated the delivery of care. The complexity of caring for patients who are pre‐judged negatively by nurses appears to engender dissonance and disparities in care delivery. Better education and training, coupled with role support about problem drug use may reduce conflict, disruption, and violence and facilitate competent care for these patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.