The production of marine habitat maps typically relies on the use of habitat classification schemes (HCSs). The choice of which HCS to use for a mapping study is often related to familiarity, established practice, and national desires. Despite a superficial similarity, HCSs differ greatly across six key properties, namely, purpose, environmental and ecological scope, spatial scale, thematic resolution, structure, and compatibility with mapping techniques. These properties impart specific strengths and weaknesses for each HCS, which are subsequently transferred to the habitat maps applying these schemes. This review has examined seven HCSs (that are commonly used and widely adopted for national and international mapping programmes), over the six properties, to understand their influence on marine habitat mapping. In addition, variation in how mappers interpret and apply HCSs introduces additional uncertainties and biases into the final maps. Recommendations are provided for improving HCSs for marine habitat mapping as well as for enhancing the working practices of mappers using habitat classification. It is hoped that implementation of these recommendations will lead to greater certainty and usage within mapping studies and more consistency between studies and adjoining maps.
A 1:30,000 substratum map for an area off the north coast of Ireland is presented. The study area is bounded in the south by the Causeway coastline and in the north by the following coordinates: top left corner (6843 ′ 36 ′′ W, 55817 ′ N) and top right corner (6827 ′ W, 55817 ′ N). This mapping has been made possible through the availability of full seafloor coverage multibeam swath bathymetry and backscatter data (both gridded to 1 m), together with ground-truthing data collected over the past 40 years. Bathymetry data were used to generate terrain indices such as slope, rugosity, aspect, fine-and broad-scale Benthic Position Index, whilst the backscatter data were interpreted visually, subjected to an unsupervised classification process using QTC Multiview, and combined with the bathymetry-derived parameters into a clustermap in ArcGIS. The resulting maps allowed us to divide the seabed into 10 distinct acoustic classes, which, linked to sediment samples, diver surveys, underwater video-tows and remotely operated vehicle surveys, were converted into a substratum map. This is the most accurate seafloor substratum map to date for the north coast of Ireland and could form the basis for more in-depth geological, biological and hydrodynamic studies of this highly dynamic coastline.
Shallow gas accumulation in unconsolidated Quaternary sediments, and associated seepage at the seafloor, is widespread in the north Irish Sea. This study integrates high-resolution seafloor bathymetry and sub-surface geophysical data to investigate shallow gas accumulations and possible fluid (gas and/or liquids) migration pathways to the seafloor in the northern part of the Irish Sea. Shallow gas occurs broadly in two geological settings: the Codling Fault Zone and the Western Irish Sea Mud Belt. The gas has been recognised to accumulate in both sandy and muddy Quaternary marine near-surface sediments and is characterised by three characteristic sub-bottom acoustic features: i) enhanced reflections, ii) acoustic turbid zones, and iii) acoustic blanking. The seepage of shallow gas at the seafloor has resulted in the formation of morphological features including methane-derived authigenic carbonates, seabed mounds and pockmarks. In many instances, the evidence for this gas as biogenic or thermogenic in origin is inconclusive. Two distinct types of pockmarks are recorded in the Western Irish Mud Belt: pockmarks with a relatively flat centre, and pockmarks with a central mound. Based on our observation and existing models, we infer that the formation of a carbonate crust at the seabed surface, is needed as a precursor for the creation of such mounds within pockmarks. The formation processes are interpreted to be different for sandy versus muddy sediments, due to variability in erodibility and sealing capacities of the substrate. We suggest that the origin of these features is linked to the presence of deeper hydrocarbon source rocks with existing and reactivated faults forming fluid migration pathways to the surface. This in turn could indicate a mixed thermogenic-biogenic origin for seeprelated structures in the study area. These features have significant implications for the future development of offshore infrastructure including marine renewable energy as well as for seabed ecology and conservation efforts in the Irish Sea.
Conservation of historic shipwrecks is prohibitively expensive and in situ preservation and recording is the preferred archaeological approach. Non-destructive high-definition 3D imaging is therefore essential for recording and managing submerged historic shipwrecks. Multibeam echosounders (MBES), the standard tool for hydrographic survey, can produce point clouds to image complex 3D structures. However, wreck imaging is often done using MBES in traditional survey mode optimised for morphological characterisation of the seafloor. This does not necessarily provide high-definition imagery required by archaeologists. This study demonstrates key factors influencing high-definition MBES imaging of wrecks through a controlled field experiment. Results show that optimal highdefinition 3D imaging is achieved through maximising the pulse rate, narrowing the angular sector, using the highest frequency and shortest pulse lengths, applied to at least 3 to 5 overlapping centreline-parallel and offset passes with additional perpendicular/oblique lines. Variations in survey design are demonstrated to exert strong controls on sounding density and distribution, with highdensity on horizontal and vertical wreck surfaces enabled by a combination of overlapping passes and offset lines. Adoption of this method would result in more widespread high-definition 3D imaging of wrecks to benefit archaeological research and develop effective mitigation strategies to minimise loss of the fragile underwater resource.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.