In social sciences, the interdependence between media systems and political systems is generally not in doubt. However, empirical knowledge about the relation between the two types of systems is rare. A deeper understanding can be gained by an international comparison of media and political systems from a macro perspective using aggregated data. The pilot study presented in this article offers an approach to international comparison based on four dimensions: freedom, diversity, centrality and tradition. These concepts serve as dimensions of comparison for both media-and political systems. The instrument is tested by using an intentionally heterogeneous sample of seven countries from around the world: China, Germany, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Russia and the US. In combination with a pragmatic use of systems theory as a theoretical framework, the dimensions allow more profound insights into the relation between media-and political systems. In sum, the research project prepares the ground for future international large-N comparisons.
Zusammenfassung: Der Beitrag präsentiert die Ergebnisse einer empirischen Erhebung auf strukturationstheoretischer Grundlage zur Kennkarte der deutschen Medien-und Redak-tionsmanager_innen. Die Akteure dieses medialen Feldes werden mitsamt den sozialen Strukturen vorgestellt. Präsentiert werden zudem die Ergebnisse umfassender Recherchen zur Menge der Medienmanager_innen in verschiedenen Medientypen. Rund 3 600 Me-dienmanager_innen wurden online befragt, 759 haben geantwortet.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.