BackgroundWhereas cross‐sectional studies have shown that obesity is associated with increased C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels in children, little is known about the impact of low‐grade inflammation on body mass changes during growth.Methods and ResultsWe assessed cross‐sectionally and longitudinally the association of high‐sensitivity (hs)‐CRP levels with overweight/obesity and related cardiometabolic risk factors in the Identification and prevention of Dietary‐ and lifestyle‐induced health Effects in Children and InfantS (IDEFICS) cohort. 16 224 children from 8 European countries (2 to 9 years) were recruited during the baseline survey (T0). After the exclusion of 7187 children because of missing hs‐CRP measurements and 2421 because of drug use during the previous week, the analysis was performed on 6616 children (Boys=3347; Girls=3269; age=6.3±1.7 years). Of them, 4110 were reexamined 2 years later (T1). Anthropometric variables, blood pressure, hs‐CRP, blood lipids, glucose and insulin were measured. The population at T0 was divided into 3 categories, according to the baseline hs‐CRP levels. Higher hs‐CRP levels were associated with significantly higher prevalence of overweight/obesity, body mass index (BMI) z‐score and central adiposity indices (P values all <0.0001), and with higher blood pressure and lower HDL‐cholesterol levels. Over the 2‐year follow‐up, higher baseline hs‐CRP levels were associated with a significant increase in BMI z‐score (P<0.001) and significantly higher risk of incident overweight/obesity.ConclusionsHigher hs‐CRP levels are associated to higher body mass and overweight/obesity risk in a large population of European children. Children with higher baseline levels of hs‐CRP had a greater increase in BMI z‐score and central adiposity over time and were at higher risk of developing overweight/obesity during growth.

Background: During the preparatory phase of the baseline survey of the IDEFICS (Identification and prevention of dietary-and lifestyle-induced health effects in children and infants) study, standardised survey procedures including instruments, examinations, methods, biological sampling and software tools were developed and pretested for their feasibility, robustness and acceptability. Methods: A pretest was conducted of full survey procedures in 119 children aged 2-9 years in nine European survey centres (N per centre ¼ 4-27, mean 13.22). Novel techniques such as ultrasound measurements to assess subcutaneous fat and bone health, heart rate monitors combined with accelerometers and sensory taste perception tests were used. Results: Biological sampling, physical examinations, sensory taste perception tests, parental questionnaire and medical interview required only minor amendments, whereas physical fitness tests required major adaptations. Callipers for skinfold measurements were favoured over ultrasonography, as the latter showed only a low-to-modest agreement with calliper measurements (correlation coefficients of r ¼ À0.22 and r ¼ 0.67 for all children). The combination of accelerometers with heart rate monitors was feasible in school children only. Implementation of the computer-based 24-h dietary recall required a complex and intensive developmental stage. It was combined with the assessment of school meals, which was changed after the pretest from portion weighing to the more feasible observation of the consumed portion size per child. The inclusion of heel ultrasonometry as an indicator of bone stiffness was the most important amendment after the pretest. Discussion: Feasibility and acceptability of all procedures had to be balanced against their scientific value. Extensive pretesting, training and subsequent refinement of the methods were necessary to assess the feasibility of all instruments and procedures in routine fieldwork and to exchange or modify procedures that would otherwise give invalid or misleading results.

No abstract