Many processing parameters can be adjusted to optimize the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process, a popular and widely used additive manufacturing techniques for plastic materials. Among those easily adjusted parameters are the nozzle temperature, printing speed, raster orientation, and layer thicknesses. Using poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) as the base material, a design of experiments analysis was performed on the main FFF parameters. A response surface methodology was applied to analyze the results and to maximize the output responses. Results have shown that the nozzle temperature is the most influential parameter on tensile properties and the crystallinity degree of printed PEEK by FFF process. Parts produced with optimized FFF parameters were then subjected to an annealing treatment to induce a relaxation of residual stress and to enhance crystallinity. The best properties for 3D printed PEEK parts were achieved with annealed parts prepared at 400°C with a printing speed of 30 mm/s, 0.15 mm layer thickness and raster orientation of [0°/15°/−15°]. The resulting parts have mechanical properties comparable to those of injected PEEK.
Many parameters of fused deposition modeling (FDM) influence the resulting mechanical properties. This can become a key factor if those parts are intended for commercial applications. This study focuses on the influence of nozzle temperature and infill line orientations for parts made with short carbon fiber (CF)-reinforced polylactic acid (PLA). Tests bars made of PLA and PLA-CF composite were produced under carefully selected conditions. As expected, PLA-CF yields higher tensile properties compared to PLA, owing to the strengthening effect of high modulus CFs. Maximum tensile properties are attained for a nozzle temperature of 230°C, for both PLA and PLA-CF. This temperature was thus selected for probing the effects of infill orientations in test bars. Among the multiple orientations tested, the combination [0°, 15°, −15°] relative to the long axis of the test bar yields the highest levels of tensile properties for both PLA and PLA-CF over the “all-purpose” [45°, 135°] orientation. Annealing can also affect crystallinity and mechanical properties of manufactured parts. Through differential scanning calorimetric analyses, the degree of crystallinity was assessed for samples annealed under various conditions. Results show that annealing increases crystallinity in PLA and PLA-CF samples, with a lower cooling rate yielding higher values. The Young’s modulus exhibits the same behavior for annealed and as printed parts, with a lower cooling rate yielding higher modulus values. This is attributed to a relaxation of the material structure as well as to the orientation of polymer chains toward the CFs.
Polymer membranes are central to the proper operation of several processes used in a wide range of applications. The production of these membranes relies on processes such as phase inversion, stretching, track etching, sintering, or electrospinning. A novel and competitive strategy in membrane production is the use of additive manufacturing that enables the easier manufacture of tailored membranes. To achieve the future development of better membranes, it is necessary to compare this novel production process to that of more conventional techniques, and clarify the advantages and disadvantages. This review article compares a conventional method of manufacturing polymer membranes to additive manufacturing. A review of 3D printed membranes is also done to give researchers a reference guide. Membranes from these two approaches were compared in terms of cost, materials, structures, properties, performance. and environmental impact. Results show that very few membrane materials are used as 3D-printed membranes. Such membranes showed acceptable performance, better structures, and less environmental impact compared with those of conventional membranes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.