IntroductionThis study assessed the comparability of complete blood count (CBC) parameters between capillary and venous samples, and extended previous research by examining the influence of different storage temperatures on CBC stability up to 7 days after sample collection.MethodsVenous and capillary blood samples were collected from 93 adult patients. Hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Ht), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), mean platelet volume (MPV), leukocytes, lymphocytes, basophils, eosinophils, erythrocytes, red cell distribution width (RDW), immature granulocytes (IG), immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF), monocytes, neutrophils, platelets, and reticulocytes were measured. Deming regression and mean relative differences between venous and capillary measurements were contrasted with desirable total allowable error (TEa). Stability was assessed in 20–27 venous blood samples stored at 4, 21–22, or 30°C, and analyzed at 0, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 h. Mean relative change with respect to baseline measurements was compared to the desirable TEa to determine acceptable stability.ResultsDeming regression demonstrated strong linear correlations and acceptable variation between venous and capillary measurements. Erythrocytes, Hb, Ht, MCH, MCV, RDW, reticulocytes, and platelets showed acceptable stability for at least 96 h at 4°C. Mean relative change exceeded desirable TEa after 24 h at 30°C for all parameters, except erythrocytes, Hb, leukocytes, and MCH.ConclusionClinical laboratory specialists and clinicians should be aware of potential differences between venous and capillary measurements, and the influence of storage conditions. Clinical validity of delayed CBC analysis depends on the clinical situation and required precision of the result.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.