Infliximab is effective as a third-line therapeutic for severe sarcoidosis; however, long-term efficacy is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the relapse rate after discontinuation of infliximab in sarcoidosis patients and predict relapse by analysis of the activity marker soluble interleukin (IL)-2 receptor (sIL-2R) and maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET).In this retrospective cohort study, the proportion of relapse was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and predicting factors were studied using Cox regression.47 sarcoidosis patients who started infliximab therapy were included in the risk analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a median time to relapse of 11.1 months and showed that 25% of the cohort relapsed within 4 months. Both mediastinal SUVmax o6.0 on FDG PET (hazard ratio 3.77, p,0.001) and serum sIL-2R o4000 pg?mL -1 (hazard ratio 2.24, p50.033) at start of therapy predicted relapse. In multivariate analysis, a mediastinal SUVmax o6.0 at initiation of therapy was an independent predictor of relapse (hazard ratio 4.33, p,0.001).The majority of patients that discontinued infliximab therapy relapsed. High serum sIL-2R and high SUVmax on FDG PET at initiation of therapy were significant predictors of relapse. These results suggest close monitoring of patients in this category when they discontinue infliximab treatment. @ERSpublications Two significant predictors of relapse after discontinuation of infliximab therapy for severe sarcoidosis

These results strongly support the notion that neutrophils play an important role in systemic-onset JIA, especially in the early inflammatory phase of the disease. The findings also demonstrate that neutrophil numbers and the inflammatory activity of systemic-onset JIA are both susceptible to IL-1 blockade.

Background Involving the end-users of scientific research (patients, carers and clinicians) in setting research priorities is important to formulate research questions that truly make a difference and are in tune with the needs of patients. We therefore aimed to generate a national research agenda for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) together with patients, their caregivers and healthcare professionals through conducting a nationwide survey among these stakeholders. Methods The James Lind Alliance method was used, tailored with additional focus groups held to involve younger patients. First, research questions were gathered through an online and hardcopy survey. The received questions that were in scope were summarised and a literature search was performed to verify that questions were unanswered. Questions were ranked in the interim survey, and the final top 10 was chosen during a prioritisation workshop. Results Two hundred and seventy-eight respondents submitted 604 questions, of which 519 were in scope. Of these 604 questions, 81 were generated in the focus groups with younger children. The questions were summarised into 53 summary questions. An evidence checking process verified that all questions were unanswered. A total of 303 respondents prioritised the questions in the interim survey. Focus groups with children generated a top 5 of their most important questions. Combining this top 5 with the top 10s of patients, carers, and clinicians led to a top 21. Out of these, the top 10 research priorities were chosen during a final workshop. Research into pain and fatigue, personalised treatment strategies and aetiology were ranked high in the Top 10. Conclusions Through this study, the top 10 research priorities for JIA of patients, their caregivers and clinicians were identified to inform researchers and research funders of the research topics that matter most to them. The top priority involves the treatment and mechanisms behind persisting pain and fatigue when the disease is in remission.