First, the residual risk in Australian donors is small in comparison with other transfusion complications and comparable to or lower than the risk in US and European nonremunerated donors. Second, mathematical risk modeling has sufficient precision to be used as a predictive tool for risk-benefit assessments of novel screening procedures. Finally, in relation to the case for implementing HBV NAT and/or anti-HBc in Australia, we conclude that at present, there is inadequate information about our donor population to perform an evidence-based risk-benefit analysis.

The study findings support the efficacy and safety of a targeted screening strategy combining antibody screening with a 6-month cellular component restriction period for donors with a declared malarial risk.

Although high s/co ratios were predictive of confirmed-positive results in all four assays, a number of confirmed-positive samples gave low values while some biologic false-positive samples showed high values. As the s/co ratio distributions for BFR and confirmed-positive results overlapped for all four PRISM assays, this study highlights the importance of serologic confirmatory testing and the need for caution when using screening IA results to assign a final donor status.

No abstract

No abstract