No abstract

No abstract

p¼0.04).The remaining categories, including words representing communal or agentic traits and "standout" adjectives, "grindstone" traits, and teaching and research words were also not statistically different between men and women applicants.Conclusions: Building upon prior research in this expanded study population, our results indicate that there are minimal language differences by sex in SLOEs for EM applicants. The wording differences noted in 2 categories were statistically significant, but of unclear real-world significance with only a 1-2 word difference between sex. Future work could evaluate how the SLOE format may contribute to this relative lack of bias compared to other fields and formats.