Somatic L1 retrotransposition events have been shown to occur in epithelial cancers. Here, we attempted to determine how early somatic L1 insertions occurred during the development of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Using L1-targeted resequencing (L1-seq), we studied different stages of four colorectal cancers arising from colonic polyps, seven pancreatic carcinomas, as well as seven gastric cancers. Surprisingly, we found somatic L1 insertions not only in all cancer types and metastases but also in colonic adenomas, well-known cancer precursors. Some insertions were also present in low quantities in normal GI tissues, occasionally caught in the act of being clonally fixed in the adjacent tumors. Insertions in adenomas and cancers numbered in the hundreds, and many were present in multiple tumor sections, implying clonal distribution. Our results demonstrate that extensive somatic insertional mutagenesis occurs very early during the development of GI tumors, probably before dysplastic growth.

The mosquito's innate immune system controls both and bacterial infections. We investigated the competitiveness of mosquitoes genetically modified to alter expression of their own anti- immune genes in a mixed-cage population with wild-type mosquitoes. We observed that genetically modified mosquitoes with increased immune activity in the midgut tissue did not have an observed fitness disadvantage and showed reduced microbial loads in both the midgut and reproductive organs. These changes result in a mating preference of genetically modified males for wild-type females, whereas wild-type males prefer genetically modified females. These changes foster the spread of the genetic modification in a mosquito cage population.

Background: Inherited cardiomyopathy associates with a range of phenotype, mediated by genetic and non-genetic factors. Non-inherited cardiomyopathy also displays varying progression and outcomes. Expression of cardiomyopathy genes is under the regulatory control of promoters and enhancers, and human genetic variation in promoters and enhancers may contribute to this variability. Methods: We superimposed epigenomic profiling from hearts and cardiomyocytes, including promoter-capture chromatin conformation information, to identify enhancers for two cardiomyopathy genes, MYH7 and LMNA . Enhancer function was validated in human cardiomyocytes derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. We also conducted a genome-wide search to ascertain genomic variation in enhancers positioned to alter cardiac expression and correlated one of these variants to cardiomyopathy progression using biobank data. Results: Multiple enhancers were identified and validated for LMNA and MYH7 , including a key enhancer that regulates the switch from MYH6 expression to MYH7 expression. Deletion of this enhancer resulted in a dose-dependent increase in MYH6 and faster contractile rate in engineered heart tissues. We searched for genomic variation in enhancer sequences across the genome, with focus on nucleotide changes that create or interrupt transcription factor binding sites. rs875908 disrupts a TBX5 binding motif and maps to an enhancer region 2KB from the transcriptional start site of MYH7 . Gene editing to remove the enhancer harboring this variant markedly reduced MYH7 expression in human cardiomyocytes. Using biobank-derived data, rs875908 associated with longitudinal echocardiographic features with cardiomyopathy. Conclusions: Enhancers regulate cardiomyopathy gene expression, and genomic variation within these enhancer regions associates with cardiomyopathic progression over time. This integrated approach identified noncoding modifiers of cardiomyopathy and is applicable to other cardiac genes.