β-Arrestins (βarrs) interact with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to desensitize G protein signaling, to initiate signaling on their own, and to mediate receptor endocytosis. Prior structural studies have revealed two unique conformations of GPCR-βarr complexes: the "tail" conformation, with βarr primarily coupled to the phosphorylated GPCR C-terminal tail, and the "core" conformation, where, in addition to the phosphorylated C-terminal tail, βarr is further engaged with the receptor transmembrane core. However, the relationship of these distinct conformations to the various functions of βarrs is unknown. Here, we created a mutant form of βarr lacking the "finger-loop" region, which is unable to form the core conformation but retains the ability to form the tail conformation. We find that the tail conformation preserves the ability to mediate receptor internalization and βarr signaling but not desensitization of G protein signaling. Thus, the two GPCR-βarr conformations can carry out distinct functions.O ver the past decade, significant efforts have been made to understand the molecular properties and regulatory mechanisms that control the function of β-arrestin (βarr) interactions with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) (1, 2). Once activated, GPCRs initiate a highly conserved signaling and regulatory cascade marked by interactions with: (i) heterotrimeric G proteins, which mediate their actions largely by promoting second-messenger generation (3); (ii) GPCR kinases (GRKs), which phosphorylate activated conformations of receptors (4); and (iii) βarrs, which bind to the phosphorylated receptors to mediate desensitization of G protein signaling and receptor internalization (5, 6). In addition to their canonical function of desensitization and internalization, βarrs have been appreciated as independent signaling units by virtue of their crucial role as both adaptors and scaffolds for an increasing number of signaling pathways (7-11).There are two driving forces that mediate βarr interactions with an activated GPCR: phosphorylation of the C-terminal tail of the receptor by GRKs and/or binding to the transmembrane core of the receptor. How each of these interactions contributes to βarr functionality remains unclear. Moreover, GPCRs tend to either interact with βarr transiently, termed "class A" GPCRs [e.g., β 2 -adrenergic receptor (β 2 AR)], or tightly, known as "class B" GPCRs [e.g., vasopressin type 2 receptor (V 2 R)]. For the current study, we use a previously described chimeric β 2 V 2 R construct, which comprises the β 2 AR with its C-terminal tail exchanged with the V 2 R C-terminal tail (12-14). The β 2 V 2 R construct provides an ideal system for studying a GPCR-βarr complex in vitro, because it maintains identical pharmacological properties to the WT β 2 AR and has a robustly increased class B affinity for βarr1, which allows stable β 2 V 2 R-βarr complexes to be formed and purified.Structural insights have shed some light onto the complexity of the interaction between GPCRs and βarrs. A recent struc...

Classically, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are thought to activate G protein from the plasma membrane and are subsequently desensitized by β-arrestin (βarr). However, some GPCRs continue to signal through G protein from internalized compartments, mediated by a GPCR-G protein-βarr 'megaplex'. Nevertheless, the megaplex's molecular architecture remains unknown. Here, we present its cryo-electron microscopy structure, which shows simultaneous engagement of human G protein and bovine βarr to the core and phosphorylated tail, respectively, of a single active human chimeric β 2-adrenergic receptor with the C-terminal tail of the arginine vasopressin type 2 receptor (β 2 V 2 R). All three components adopt their canonical active conformations, suggesting that a single megaplex GPCR is capable of simultaneously activating G protein and βarr. Our findings provide a structural basis for GPCR-mediated sustained, internalized G protein signaling. Nguyen et al.

Significance Lassa virus is, after dengue virus, the second most common cause of viral hemorrhagic fever. In susceptible individuals, Lassa virus infection is associated with vascular permeability, leading to tissue edema, organ failure, and death. Hemorrhagic fever viruses efficiently infect vascular endothelial cells, but are generally considered noncytopathic. Thus, the mechanism of virus-induced vascular injury remains unclear. Using the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus variant clone 13, a prototype of Lassa virus, we show here that lethal vascular leakage in susceptible mice was completely prevented by type I IFN receptor blockade. Therefore, approaches that target type I IFNs or effector molecules induced by these cytokines may be considered for the treatment of Lassa fever and other severe hemorrhagic viral illnesses.