Purpose: Since the release of the 1988 World Health Organization report on the need for interprofessional education (IPE) programs, various forms of IPE curricula have been implemented within institutions of higher education. The purpose of this paper is to describe results of a study using the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) to compare physician assistant (PA) students with other health professions students. Methods: The RIPLS survey was completed by 158 health professions graduate students, including 71 PA students, at a small northeastern university in the fall of 2010. Students were enrolled in either counseling psychology, occupational therapy, physical therapy, or PA studies. Students completed the RIPLS survey, demographic questions, and a question regarding experience with the health care environment. Results: PA students scored significantly lower on three of the four subscales of the RIPLS survey, as well as lower in total score. Females of all health professions scored significantly higher on the RIPLS total score and on the Teamwork and Collaboration subscale than did males. Students with prior exposure to the health care system as a patient or as an immediate family member of a patient scored significantly higher on the Negative Professional Identity subscale than did students without such exposure.
Conclusions:Results indicate that PA students may value interprofessional collaboration less than other health professions students.Also, there may be gender and experiential differences in readiness for interprofessional learning. These findings may affect the design of IPE experiences and support integration of interprofessional experiences into PA education. J Physician Assist Educ 2012;23(2):8-15
This study investigated counselor self-efficacy and anxiety among psychology students at different levels of training. All participants, including undergraduate and graduate students, completed a set of questionnaires covering topics ranging from clinical experience to feelings encountered during counseling sessions (for example, anxiety and confidence). We compared students across various levels of training and computed a multivariate analysis of variance, with dependent variables measuring self-efficacy, self-esteem, life satisfaction, and general happiness. Results indicated curvilinear relationships across level of training for self-efficacy and anxiety about seeing clients. These findings, as well as possible theoretical underpinnings, have important implications for supervision and training.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.