BACKGROUND Both bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and c-kit+ cardiac stem cells (CSCs) improve left ventricular remodeling in porcine models and clinical trials. We previously showed, using xenogeneic (human) cells in immunosuppressed animals with acute ischemic heart disease, that these 2 cell types act synergistically in combination. OBJECTIVES To more accurately model the clinical situation, we tested whether the combination of autologous MSCs and CSCs produced greater improvement of cardiac performance than MSCs alone in a nonimmunosuppressed porcine model of chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS Three months after ischemia/reperfusion infusion injury, Gottingen mini-swine were injected transendocardially with MSCs alone (n = 6) or in combination with cardiac-derived CSCs (n = 8), MSCs, or placebo (vehicle; n = 6). Cardiac functional and anatomic parameters were assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance at baseline and before and after therapy. RESULTS Both groups of cell-treated animals exhibited significantly reduced scar size (MSCs: −44.1 ± 6.8%; CSC/MSC: −37.2 ± 5.4%; placebo: −12 ± 4.2%; p < 0.0001), increased viable tissue, and improved wall motion relative to placebo 3 months post-injection. Ejection fraction (EF) improved (MSCs: +2.9 ± 1.6; CSC/MSC: +6.9 ± 2.8; placebo: +2.5 ± 1.6 EF units; p = 0.0009), as did stroke volume, cardiac output, and diastolic strain, but only in the combination-treated animals, which also exhibited increased cardiomyocyte mitotic activity. CONCLUSIONS These findings illustrate that interactions between MSCs and CSCs enhance cardiac performance more than MSCs alone, establish the safety of autologous cell combination strategies, and support the development of second-generation cell therapeutic products.

Rationale Accumulating data supports a therapeutic role for mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy; however, there is no consensus on the optimal route of delivery. Objective We tested the hypothesis that the route of MSC delivery influences the reduction in infarct size (IS) and improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods and Results We performed a meta-analysis investigating the effect of MSC therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) preclinical studies (58 studies; n=1165 mouse, rat, swine) which revealed a reduction in IS and improvement of LVEF in all animal models. Route of delivery was analyzed in AMI swine studies and clinical trials (6 clinical trials; n=334 patients). In AMI swine studies, transendocardial stem cell injection (TESI) reduced IS (n=49, 9.4% reduction 95%CI −15.9, −3.0), whereas intramyocardial injection (DI), intravenous infusion (IV), and intracoronary infusion (IC) indicated no improvement. Similarly, TESI improved LVEF (n=65, 9.1% increase 95%CI 3.7, 14.5), as did DI and IV, while IC demonstrated no improvement. In humans, changes of LVEF paralleled these results, with TESI improving LVEF (n=46, 7.0% increase 95%CI 2.7, 11.3), as did IV, but again IC demonstrating no improvement. Conclusions MSC therapy improves cardiac function in animal models of both AMI and ICM. The route of delivery appears to play a role in modulating the efficacy of MSC therapy in AMI swine studies and clinical trials, suggesting the superiority of TESI due to its reduction in IS and improvement of LVEF, which has important implications for the design of future studies.

Background The combination of autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and cardiac stem cells (CSCs) synergistically reduces scar size and improves cardiac function in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Whereas allogeneic (allo-)MSCs are immunoevasive, the capacity of CSCs to similarly elude the immune system remains controversial, potentially limiting the success of allogeneic cell combination therapy (ACCT). Objective We tested the hypothesis that ACCT synergistically promotes cardiac regeneration without provoking immunologic reactions. Methods Gottingen swine with experimental ischemic cardiomyopathy were randomized to receive transendocardial injections of either allo-MSC + allo-CSC (ACCT: 200 million MSCs/1 million CSCs, n=7), 200 million allo-MSC (n=8), 1 million allo-CSC (n=4), or placebo (Plasma-Lyte A, n=6)]. Swine were assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMR) and pressure volume catheterization. Immune response was tested by histological analyses. Results Both ACCT and allo-MSCs reduced scar size by −11.1±4.8%, (p=0.012) and −9.5±4.8 (p=0.047), respectively. Only ACCT, but not MSC or CSC, prevented ongoing negative remodeling by offsetting increases in chamber volumes. Importantly, ACCT exerted the greatest effect on systolic function, improving the end-systolic pressure volume relation (+0.98±0.41 mmHg/mL, p=0.016) The ACCT group had more phospho-histone H3 (pHH3)+ (a marker of mitosis) cardiomyocytes (p=0.04), and non-cardiomyocytes (p=0.0002) compared to the placebo group in some regions of the heart. Inflammatory sites in ACCT and MSC swine contained immunotolerant CD3+/CD25+/FoxP3 regulatory T cells (p<0.0001). Histologic analysis showed absent to low grade inflammatory infiltrates without cardiomyocyte necrosis. Conclusion ACCT demonstrates synergistic effects to enhance cardiac regeneration and left ventricular functional recovery in a swine model of chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy without adverse immunological reaction. Clinical translation to humans is warranted.

Endothelial dysfunction is characterized by nitric oxide dysregulation and an altered redox state. Oxidative stress and inflammatory markers prevail, thus promoting atherogenesis and hypertension, important risk factors for the development and progression of heart failure. There has been a reemerging interest in the role that endothelial dysfunction plays in the failing circulation. Accordingly, patients with heart failure are being clinically assessed for endothelial dysfunction via various methods, including flow-mediated vasodilation, peripheral arterial tonometry, quantification of circulating endothelial progenitor cells, and early and late endothelial progenitor cell outgrowth measurements. Although the mechanisms underlying endothelial dysfunction are intimately related to cardiovascular disease and heart failure, it remains unclear whether targeting endothelial dysfunction is a feasible strategy for ameliorating heart failure progression. This review focuses on the pathophysiology of endothelial dysfunction, the mechanisms linking endothelial dysfunction and heart failure, and the various diagnostic methods currently used to measure endothelial function, ultimately highlighting the therapeutic implications of targeting endothelial dysfunction for the treatment of heart failure.