The synthesis and affinities of six new 3-substituted beta-carbolines (6-10, 12) for the benzodiazepine receptor (BzR) are described. These analogs were used both to probe the dimensions of the hydrophobic pocket in the benzodiazepine receptor and to test the predictive ability of a previously reported 3D-QSAR regression model. Of the new analogs synthesized, the gamma-branched derivatives (isobutoxy, 7, IC50 = 93 nM; isopentoxy, 9, IC50 = 104 nM) display significantly higher affinity for the BzR than either the beta-branched (sec-butoxy, 6, IC50 = 471 nM; tert-butyl ketone, 12, IC50 = 358 nM) or delta-branched (isopentoxy, 8, IC50 = 535 nM) analogs. An exception to this rule is the gamma-branched 3-benzyloxy derivative 10 (IC50 > 1000 nM) which appears to have a chain length that is too long to be accommodated by the BzR. The standard error of prediction for these six new beta-carbolines using the original regression model is significantly lower than the standard error estimate of the cross validation runs on the training set, hence the predictions made using this model are much better than expected. In order to obtain more credible predictions, a new procedure called GOLPE (generating optimal linear PLS estimates) was used to eliminate irrelevant electrostatic and steric descriptors from the regression equation. A substantial reduction in the standard error estimate resulted. The predictions from this new regression equation were somewhat less accurate than the ones obtained with the original regression equation; however the standard error of prediction and the standard error estimate are in much closer agreement. Finally, to probe the effect that the quality of the steric and electrostatic potentials has on 3D-QSAR analyses, the semiempirical MNDO parallel PRDDOE geometries and Mulliken charges used in the original analyses were replaced with ab initio 3-21G parallel 6-31G* geometries and electrostatic potential fit charges. A modest decrease in the standard error estimate and increase in cross validated R2 resulted.
A series of rigid planar azadiindoles (8a, 8b, and 8d), benzannelated pyridodiindoles (11a, 11b, and 11d), and indolopyridoimidazoles (11c, 20, and 24) were synthesized from 4-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-beta-carboline 5 via the Fischer indole cyclization with the appropriate arylhydrazines. These analogues were employed as probes ("molecular yardsticks") to define the spatial dimensions of the lipophilic regions of the benzodiazepine receptor (BzR) binding cleft. Benzannelated indoles 11a-d and indolopyridoimidazoles 20 and 24 were important in establishing an area of negative interaction (S1, see Figure 6, part b) in the binding cleft common to the interactions of both inverse agonists and agonists. Data from this chemical and computer-assisted analysis of the pharmacophore (see Figure 6) indicates that inverse agonists and agonists bind to the same binding region, but the pharmacophoric descriptors required for the two activities are different, in keeping with previous studies with these planar ligands. However, the hydrogen bond donating site H1 and the lipophilic region L1 in the receptor binding site are common interactions experienced by both series of ligands. The low affinities of both indolo[3,2-c]carbazole (3a) and indolo[3,2-b]isoquinoline (3b) for the BzR are consonant with the requirements of a hydrogen bond acceptor interaction at donor site H1 and a hydrogen bond donor interaction at acceptor site A2 for potent inverse agonist activity in the beta-carboline series. The hydrochloride salts of 1-aza- 8a (IC50 10.6 nM), 2-aza- 8b (IC50 51.5 nM), and 4-azadiindole 8d (IC50 11.2 nM) were found to be much more soluble in water than the corresponding salt of the parent diindole 2. Moreover, aza analogues 8a and 8b were shown to be partial inverse agonists with proconvulsant potencies comparable to that of the parent diindole 2.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.