No abstract

Rotator cuff tear (RCT) is a common shoulder condition frequently treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) after conservative interventions have failed. Postoperative shoulder stiffness (POSS) is a common complication after ARCR. The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of POSS after ARCR in total and based on tear extent prior to ARCR. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), and ScienceDirect databases. The search terms were "rotator cuff repair" AND "arthrofibrosis" OR "postoperative shoulder stiffness." Articles were selected based on ARCR and the presence of POSS documentation. Twenty-five articles out of 284 articles met the final selection criteria after reviewing for patients who received ARCR. Out of all patients (n=9,373), 597 had POSS (6.4%). Out of the 2,424 patients with a specified tear pattern, 96 out of 1,862 (5.2%) patients with full-thickness tears and 58 out of 562 (10.3%) patients with partial-thickness tears had POSS after ARCR. Partial-thickness tears are associated with higher rates of POSS after ARCR as compared to full-thickness tears (p<0.001). Overall, POSS is a common complication after ARCR with an incidence of 6.4%, regardless of tear type. POSS is more common in patients who receive ARCR for partial-thickness RCT (10.3%) as compared to patients who receive ARCR for full-thickness RCT (5.2%). More research is needed to determine other factors impacting the incidence of POSS after ARCR.

Background and objectiveRotator cuff tear (RCT) is an orthopedic shoulder pathology commonly managed via arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) after the failure of conservative treatment options. Physical therapy (PT) after ARCR is an important component of patient recovery. Postoperative complications, such as postoperative shoulder stiffness (POSS), are frequent among these patients and place a significant burden on patients and clinicians. The purpose of this study is to analyze temporal PT utilization among patients after ARCR and its potential to improve patient outcomes and examine possible factors affecting postoperative complication rates. MethodsAn epidemiological study was performed by using a large de-identified national health research network (TriNetX) within the United States to search for patients with a diagnosis of partial or complete RCT and subsequent ARCR. Data were collected on patient demographics, number of postoperative PT visits, and PT visits distribution in the early postoperative period. Statistical analysis was performed to analyze factors that impacted the utilization of postoperative PT after ARCR. ResultsA total of 21,540 patients underwent ARCR with 11,312 receiving ARCR for partial RCT and 10,228 for complete RCT. Of all ARCR patients, 6,923 (32.1%) received postoperative PT within one year of ARCR. Patients with partial RCT had a greater number of PT visits (mean ±SD: 3.85 ± 8.33; min-max: 0-110; t = 15.2) compared to patients with complete RCT (2.90 ± 7.97; min-max: 0-125) after ARCR (p<0.001). Patients with ARCR for partial RCT also had more visits within the first 12 weeks after ARCR as compared to patients with ARCR for complete RCT (p<0.001). Female patients had more visits than male patients after ARCR, regardless of the RCT extent (p<0.001). ConclusionPartial RCT and female sex are associated with increased postoperative PT usage after ARCR. Postoperative PT utilization has high variability after ARCR, regardless of the RCT extent. More research is needed to further explore the impact of PT utilization on postoperative complications after ARCR.

Musculoskeletal shoulder pain (MSP) is a common orthopedic condition frequently treated by orthopedic surgeons and physical therapists in an interdisciplinary manner. Dry needling with electrical stimulation (DNES) is an increasingly popular intervention used for the conservative treatment of MSP during physical therapy. To date, no systematic review and meta-analysis have examined the impact of DNES on outcomes in patients with MSP. This study aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of DNES in patients with MSP to improve patient outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science from database inception to March 10, 2023. Inclusion criteria were studies with DNES as an intervention, recorded patient outcomes, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only. DNES with or without conventional physical therapy (CPT) was compared to CPT alone, which included interventions such as exercise, manual therapy, dry needling without electrical stimulation, and/or interferential current. A total of five RCTs were analyzed from 144 articles retrieved on the initial search. Included patients (n=342) had an average age of 48.75 ± 5.92 years, an average follow-up time of 3.40 ± 1.42 months, and 184 patients receiving DNES with or without CPT. Patients treated with DNES with or without CPT (n=163) had a frequency-weighted mean decrease in pain of 4.8 ± 1.4 points, whereas patients treated with CPT alone (n=158) had a frequency-weighted mean decrease in pain of 3.3 ± 2.2 points. For metaanalysis of pain outcomes (n=321 total patients), DNES with or without CPT improved pain by 1.40/10 points as compared to CPT alone with no significant difference between groups (p=0.203; Cohen's d effect size (ES): 4.352; 95% CI: -2.343, 11.048). Patients treated with DNES with or without CPT (n=118) had a frequencyweighted mean decrease in disability of 34.7 ± 9.1 points. In contrast, patients treated with CPT alone (n=115) had a frequency-weighted decrease in disability of 20.1 ± 5.0 points. For meta-analysis of disability outcomes (n=233 total patients), DNES with or without CPT did not have a significant improvement in disability as compared to CPT alone (p=0.282; Cohen's d ES: 0.543; 95% CI: -0.446, 1.532). No serious adverse effects were reported for patients treated with DNES with or without CPT or CPT alone. DNES with or without CPT may significantly improve pain and disability in patients with MSP. However, DNES with or without CPT does not provide statistically significant improvements in pain or disability compared to CPT alone. Furthermore, DNES appears to be a safe intervention for MSP.

Pediatric patellar instability and/or dislocation is a challenging diagnosis category that requires an interdisciplinary team consisting of orthopedic surgeons and physical therapists for optimized patient outcomes. This educational case series outlines core concepts for three patients with unique patellar dislocation presentations. Case 1 is a 16-year-old male who presented with a history of five knee traumatic patellar dislocations with self-reduction and underwent knee arthroscopic surgery with debridement and microfracture of the patella chondral defect, arthroscopic lateral release to improve the patellar tilt, and medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Case 2 is a 15-year-old female who presented with chronic knee pain and patella instability who underwent knee arthroscopic surgery with abrasion arthroplasty, microfracture of the patella, lateral release, tibial tubercle osteotomy medializing osteotomy, and MPFL reconstruction. Case 3 is a 14-year-old male who presented after a single episode of lateral patella dislocation and underwent open reduction and fixation of the lateral femoral condyle osteochondral fracture, a Grammont patellar medialization procedure, and MPFL reconstruction. All three patients received postoperative physical therapy (PT) to improve function and outcomes. These cases represent important concepts of patellar containment, risk factors for recurrent instability, associated pathology, and appropriate surgical care and postoperative rehabilitation. Furthermore, this case series highlights management decisions and pathways for three patients with different symptoms related to patellar instability, subsequent surgical correction, and postoperative physical therapy. Overall, interdisciplinary care of common pediatric orthopedic conditions can help improve patient outcomes and satisfaction. By understanding the biomechanics and decision-making surgical parameters regarding patellofemoral instability, clinicians can provide patients with better care.