In pathologically positive necks, PET/CT was statistically more reliable at identifying positive disease than CT or MRI alone. Furthermore, such a result is achieved without a statistically significant difference in false positivity between PET/CT and CT or MRI. This suggests that PET/CT positivity, despite negative clinical exam and CT/MRI findings, may be more likely to signify pathologic disease and require appropriate treatment.

Objective Our objective was to explore whether there are differences in institutional trust across racial/ethnic groups and what factors might contribute to these differences. Methods We studied a convenience sample of 569 adults in Chicago grocery stores who self-identified as African American, Mexican-Hispanic, or white. We measured institutional trust and dichotomized responses into “high” and “low” trust. We used chi squared tests to examine differences in institutional trust across racial/ethnic groups and stepwise multivariable logistic regression to investigate how sociodemographic factors, health care access, health care usage, and previous negative experience with the health care system modified this relationship. Results In unadjusted analysis, race/ethnicity was significantly associated with institutional trust (p<0.001). In the fully adjusted model, African Americans and Mexican-Hispanics had greater odds of reporting low trust compared to whites (OR:1.90; 95%CI,1.13–3.17; and OR:2.34; 95%CI,1.43–3.81, respectively); reporting a previous negative health care experience was the only other factor significantly related to having low trust (OR:2.84; 95%CI,1.83–4.41). Conclusions We found lower institutional trust in African Americans and Mexican-Hispanics and among participants reporting previous negative health care experiences. Practice implications Improving health care experiences, especially for racial/ethnic minority groups, could improve institutional trust and decrease health disparities in these populations.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 7 levels were more tumorigenic, but less migratory, and with a lower EMT score, than those with higher let-7 levels. We conclude that let-7 expression and epithelial/mesenchymal state are valuable predictors of HGSOC proliferation, in vitro self-renewal, and tumor burden in vivo.

The initiation of a TORS program in the post-FDA setting can be achieved in a safe and efficient manner. Early results of pioneering TORS centers are reproducible. Continued investigation of TORS as a treatment option for oropharyngeal carcinoma is warranted.

Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer death in Hispanic/Latino women nationwide. Hispanic women are more likely to be presented with advanced disease and adverse prognosis subtypes. The aim of this study is to describe the clinico‐ pathological characteristics and disparities in breast cancer in this group at two tertiary care University‐based medical centers. After IRB approval, Cancer registry was used to analyze the variables of 3441 patients with breast cancer diagnosed and treated consecutively at two large tertiary University based medical and cancer center database centers in El Paso, TX and Loma Linda, CA between 2005 and 2015. Association between race/ethnicity and cancer type, stage, hormone receptor status and treatment option were investigated. Overall 45.5% of the patients were Hispanic (n: 1566) and those were more likely to be diagnosed at a younger age (57 years) similar to African Americans, more likely to have invasive ductal carcinoma type (82.7%) & triple negative disease (17.1%, 95%CI: 15% to 19%). 58.8% of Hispanics (95%CI: 56% to 61%) have hormone receptor (HR)+ & HER2− as opposed to 71% in non‐Hispanic White people. In addition, Hispanic individuals presented with advanced stages of BC (25.3%, 95% CI: 23% to 28%) similar to African American (25.4%), and had a lower proportion of lumpectomy (50%) similar to African American (50%). When compared to African American patients, Hispanic patients had a higher prevalence of triple negative BC (17.11% in Hispanics Versus 13.86% in African American). Conclusion: Hispanics had significantly higher relative risk of advanced stages at presentation (Relative Risk Ratio (RRR) = 2.05, P < 0.001), triple negative tumors (RRR = 2.64, P < 0.0001), HER2 + /HR ‐ disease (RRR = 1.77, P < 0.0001), and less HR+ /HER2− BC (RRR = 0.69, P < 0.0001). Hispanics and African Americans are diagnosed with breast cancer at a younger age, have a higher prevalence of Triple negative breast cancer, and are diagnosed at more advanced stages of disease. Increasing awareness and targeting minority populations for health promotion interventions, screening and early detection continue to be of paramount importance to reduce the burden of health disparities.