Cardiac auscultation has limited accuracy for the detection of VHD in asymptomatic patients and is a poor diagnostic screening tool in primary care, particularly for overweight subjects. Ensuring easy access to echocardiography in patients with symptoms suggesting VHD is likely to represent a better diagnostic strategy.

1. Obstructive sleep apnoea and snoring are associated with daytime hypertension. It is uncertain whether this association is directly due to the disturbed sleeping respiration or the result of confounding variables, particularly obesity, smoking and alcohol intake. 2. Ambulatory blood pressure and echocardiographic left ventricular muscle mass were measured in 19 patients with obstructive sleep apnoea, 19 men who snore without apnoea and 38 control subjects matched for age, sex, body mass index, smoking and alcohol intake. Ambulatory blood pressure was also measured before and after treatment in 11 patients with obstructive sleep apnoea and their matched control subjects. 3. Compared with matched control subjects, untreated obstructive sleep apnoea and snoring were not associated with an increase in daytime blood pressure. A daytime elevation of either systolic or diastolic blood pressure of > 3.8 mmHg due to obstructive sleep apnoea or snoring was excluded with 95% confidence in each of the study groups. Daytime blood pressure was also unchanged when obstructive sleep apnoea was treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Night-time blood pressure was not significantly different in the patients with obstructive sleep apnoea or the snorers when compared with their matched control subjects. However, a fall in night-time systolic blood pressure was seen in the patients with obstructive sleep apnoea after treatment [fall in systolic blood pressure -6.3 (SD 8.2) mmHg, P < 0.02]. 4. Left ventricular diameter, wall thickness and calculated mass were similar in each of the study groups and their matched control groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

ObjectiveThe study aims were (1) to identify the community prevalence of moderate or greater mitral or tricuspid regurgitation (MR/TR), (2) to compare subjects identified by population screening with those with known valvular heart disease (VHD), (3) to understand the mechanisms of MR/TR and (4) to assess the rate of valve intervention and long-term outcome.MethodsAdults aged ≥65 years registered at seven family medicine practices in Oxfordshire, UK were screened for inclusion (n=9504). Subjects with known VHD were identified from hospital records and those without VHD invited to undergo transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) within the Oxford Valvular Heart Disease Population Study (OxVALVE). The study population ultimately comprised 4755 subjects. The severity and aetiology of MR and TR were assessed by integrated comprehensive TTE assessment.ResultsThe prevalence of moderate or greater MR and TR was 3.5% (95% CI 3.1 to 3.8) and 2.6% (95% CI 2.3 to 2.9), respectively. Primary MR was the most common aetiology (124/203, 61.1%). Almost half of cases were newly diagnosed by screening: MR 98/203 (48.3%), TR 69/155 (44.5%). Subjects diagnosed by screening were less symptomatic, more likely to have primary MR and had a lower incidence of aortic valve disease. Surgical intervention was undertaken in six subjects (2.4%) over a median follow-up of 64 months. Five-year survival was 79.8% in subjects with isolated MR, 84.8% in those with isolated TR, and 59.4% in those with combined MR and TR (p=0.0005).ConclusionsModerate or greater MR/TR is common, age-dependent and is underdiagnosed. Current rates of valve intervention are extremely low.

No abstract

No abstract