The blood–brain barrier (BBB) restricts the entry of proteins as well as potential drugs to cerebral tissues. We previously reported that a family of Kunitz domain‐derived peptides called Angiopeps can be used as a drug delivery system for the brain. Here, we further characterize the transcytosis ability of these peptides using an in vitro model of the BBB and in situ brain perfusion. These peptides, and in particular Angiopep‐2, exhibited higher transcytosis capacity and parenchymal accumulation than do transferrin, lactoferrin, and avidin. Angiopep‐2 transport and accumulation in brain endothelial cells were unaffected by the P‐glycoprotein inhibitor, cyclosporin A, indicating that this peptide is not a substrate for the efflux pump P‐glycoprotein. However, competition studies show that activated α2‐macroglobulin, a specific ligand for the low‐density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein‐1 (LRP1) and Angiopep‐2 can share the same receptor. In addition, LRP1 was detected in glioblastomas and brain metastases from lung and skin cancers. Fluorescent microscopy also revealed that Alexa488‐Angiopep‐2 co‐localized with LRP1 in brain endothelial cell monolayers. Overall, these results suggest that Angiopep‐2 transport across the BBB is, in part, mediated by LRP1.

By controlling access to the brain, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) restricts the entry of proteins and potential drugs to cerebral tissues. We demonstrate here the transcytosis ability of aprotinin and peptides derived from Kunitz domains using an in vitro model of the BBB and in situ brain perfusion. Aprotinin transcytosis across bovine brain capillary endothelial cell (BBCEC) monolayers is at least 10-fold greater than that of holo-transferrin. Sucrose permeability was unaffected by high concentrations of aprotinin, indicating that transcytosis of aprotinin was unrelated to changes in the BBCEC monolayer integrity. Alignment of the amino acid sequence of aprotinin with the Kunitz domains of human proteins allowed the identification and design of a family of peptides, named Angiopeps. These peptides, and in particular Angiopep-2, exhibit higher transcytosis capacity and parenchyma accumulation than aprotinin. Overall, these results suggest that these Kunitz-derived peptides could be advantageously used as a new brain delivery system for pharmacological agents that do not readily enter the brain.

One of the main difficulties with primary rat brain endothelial cell (RBEC) cultures is obtaining pure cultures. The variation in purity limits the achievement of in vitro models of the rat blood-brain barrier. As P-glycoprotein expression is known to be much higher in RBECs than in any contaminating cells, we have tested the effect of five P-glycoprotein substrates (vincristine, vinblastine, colchicine, puromycin and doxorubicin) on RBEC cultures, assuming that RBECs would resist the treatment with these toxic compounds whereas contaminating cells would not. Treatment with either 4 lg/mL puromycin for the first 2 days of culture or 3 lg/mL puromycin for the first 3 days showed the best results without causing toxicity to the cells. Transendothelial electrical resistance was significantly increased in cell monolayers treated with puromycin compared with untreated cell monolayers. When cocultured with astrocytes in the presence of cAMP, the puromycin-treated RBEC monolayer showed a highly reduced permeability to sodium fluorescein (down to 0.75 · 10 )6 cm/s) and a high electrical resistance (up to 500 W · cm 2 ). In conclusion, this method of RBEC purification will allow the production of in vitro models of the rat blood-brain barrier for cellular and molecular biology studies as well as pharmacological investigations. Keywords: blood-brain barrier, in vitro model, P-glycoprotein, puromycin, rat brain microvessel endothelium. In the last decade, many efforts have been made to produce reliable in vitro models in order to study the blood-brain barrier (BBB). It is indeed important to better understand the complex cellular and molecular interactions at the interface between blood and brain. The BBB regulates the passage of physiological substances into and out of the CNS and protects it against potentially harmful substances present in the blood. It also prevents the passage of pharmacological substances into the CNS. In order to optimize drug delivery to the CNS, it is important to gain knowledge about the passage of drug candidates through the BBB, especially their effects on the CNS and their toxicity to this barrier (Begley 1996;Tsuji and Tamai 1997). The better we understand BBB regulation, the better we will be able to conceive treatments for CNS pathologies, including neurodegenerative diseases and brain tumours