E + P resulted in a statistically significant doubling of median PFS, with an acceptable toxicity profile and encouraging OS. A multinational, phase III trial (SYMMETRY) of E + P compared with paclitaxel alone in metastatic melanoma has closed.

a b s t r a c tObjective. There is a need to develop and validate biomarkers for treatment response and survival in tuboovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). The chemotherapy response score (CRS) stratifies patients into Gynecologic Oncology 154 (2019) 441-448 complete/near-complete (CRS3), partial (CRS2), and no/minimal (CRS1) response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Our aim was to review current evidence to determine whether the CRS is prognostic in women with tubo-ovarian HGSC treated with NACT.Methods. We established an international collaboration to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis, pooling individual patient data from 16 sites in 11 countries. Patients had stage IIIC/IV HGSC, 3-4 NACT cycles and N6-months follow-up. Random effects models were used to derive combined odds ratios in the pooled population to investigate associations between CRS and progression free and overall survival (PFS and OS).Results. 877 patients were included from published and unpublished studies. Median PFS and OS were 15 months (IQR 5-65) and 28 months (IQR 7-92) respectively. CRS3 was seen in 249 patients (28%). The pooled hazard ratios (HR) for PFS and OS for CRS3 versus CRS1/CRS2 were 0·55 (95% CI, 0·45-0·66; P b 0·001) and 0·65 (95% CI 0·50-0·85, P = 0·002) respectively; no heterogeneity was identified (PFS: Q = 6·42, P = 0·698, I2 = 0·0%; OS: Q = 6·89, P = 0·648, I2 = 0·0%). CRS was significantly associated with PFS and OS in multivariate models adjusting for age and stage. Of 306 patients with known germline BRCA1/2 status, those with BRCA1/2 mutations (n = 80) were more likely to achieve CRS3 (P = 0·027).Conclusions. CRS3 was significantly associated with improved PFS and OS compared to CRS1/2. This validation of CRS in a real-world setting demonstrates it to be a robust and reproducible biomarker with potential to be incorporated into therapeutic decision-making and clinical trial design.• The Chemotherapy response score (CRS) assesses histological effect in ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). • The CRS is associated with progression-free and overall survival.• CRS could provide useful information to estimate a patient's probability of early vs. late relapse.• The CRS is an appealing primary endpoint in clinical trials as a surrogate for survival as it can be measured earlier. • We recommend the CRS be incorporated as an endpoint in clinical trials of novel therapeutic agents that have a NACT arm.

Introduction Uterine sarcomas are a group of rare tumours with heterogeneous morphological and genetic features. Recent advances in the molecular characterisation of these tumours have identified a novel clinicopathological category underpinned by NTRK gene fusions. Case report We present the case of a 42-year-old woman with a polypoid cervical lesion formed of densely cellular, short, haphazard fascicles of monomorphic spindle cells that lacked coagulative necrosis and which showed high mitotic activity. On immunohistochemistry, the tumour was diffusely positive for pan-Trk and weakly positive for CD34 but was negative for a range of other markers, including cytokeratins, smooth muscle markers, hormone receptors and S100. FISH analysis using a NTRK1 break-apart probe was above the threshold for translocation positivity and subsequent next-generation sequencing (NGS) identified a TPM3-NTRK1 fusion. Discussion NTRK-rearranged uterine sarcomas are a novel subset of gynaecological mesenchymal neoplasms characterised by cytological isomorphism and fibrosarcoma-like morphology. Although distinction from more common mesenchymal neoplasms is possible on the basis of morphology and immunohistochemistry, exclusion of rare differential diagnoses, such as malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour or the recently described COL1A1-PDGFB fusion sarcoma, requires molecular work-up with FISH or NGS. Identification of these rare tumours is clinically relevant because of their cervical location and the possible role for tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors in their treatment.

Standardisation of pathological evaluation of tissue responses to therapy permits robust stratification of patient outcomes for management decisions and allows comparison of results across clinical trials. In gynaecological pathology there are two major areas where pathological assessment of treatment response is currently used to determine ongoing therapy. High‐grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) of tubo‐ovarian origin frequently presents as high‐stage disease and may be managed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy with debulking surgery. The chemotherapy response score (CRS) is a reproducible, validated three‐tiered morphological scoring system to assess the response of HGSC to treatment. Interobserver agreement is shown to be substantial following online training, and women with CRS3 have significantly improved progression‐free and overall survival. Low‐grade endometrioid endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia may be managed by progestogenic therapy in women who wish to preserve fertility or for whom medical co‐morbidities preclude surgical management. The response to treatment is assessed histologically in successive endometrial biopsies. The histological parameters are well described, but the pathological classification of treatment response is still under development. Pathological assessment of the response to treatment is incorporated into clinical guidelines.