PurposeTo assess cardiothoracic structure and function in patients with pectus excavatum compared with control subjects using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).MethodThirty patients with pectus excavatum deformity (23 men, 7 women, age range: 14-67 years) underwent CMR using 1.5-Tesla scanner (Siemens) and were compared to 25 healthy controls (18 men, 7 women, age range 18-50 years). The CMR protocol included cardiac cine images, pulmonary artery flow quantification, time resolved 3D contrast enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) and high spatial resolution CEMRA. Chest wall indices including maximum transverse diameter, pectus index (PI), and chest-flatness were measured in all subjects. Left and right ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF, RVEF), ventricular long and short dimensions (LD, SD), mid-ventricle myocardial shortening, pulmonary-systemic circulation time, and pulmonary artery flow were quantified.ResultsIn patients with pectus excavatum, the pectus index was 9.3 ± 5.0 versus 2.8 ± 0.4 in controls (P < 0.001). No significant differences between pectus excavatum patients and controls were found in LV ejection fraction, LV myocardial shortening, pulmonary-systemic circulation time or pulmonary flow indices. In pectus excavatum, resting RV ejection fraction was reduced (53.9 ± 9.6 versus 60.5 ± 9.5; P = 0.013), RVSD was reduced (P < 0.05) both at end diastole and systole, RVLD was increased at end diastole (P < 0.05) reflecting geometric distortion of the RV due to sternal compression.ConclusionDepression of the sternum in pectus excavatum patients distorts RV geometry. Resting RVEF was reduced by 6% of the control value, suggesting that these geometrical changes may influence myocardial performance. Resting LV function, pulmonary circulation times and pulmonary vascular anatomy and perfusion indices were no different to controls.
To investigate a high spatial resolution peripheral contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) protocol, applying a dedicated multi-channel array coil and accelerated parallel acquisition at 3.0T in evaluation of patients with peripheral vascular disease. Twenty patients with peripheral vascular disease underwent multi-station high spatial resolution peripheral CE-MRA at 3T. The image quality, presence of venous contamination, image noise, and artifact were evaluated by 2 radiologists independently. Assessment of arterial disease for 540 arterial segments was performed, and findings were correlated with conventional catheter angiography in 10 patients. All studies were yielded high diagnostic image quality. Venous contamination and artifact were minimal and never interfered with diagnosis. Sixty seven arterial segments with significant stenoses (>0%) were detected by observers with excellent interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.88). There was a significant correlation between CE-MRA and conventional angiography (Rs = 0.91 and 0.94 for reader 1 and 2, respectively) for the assessment of the degree of stenosis. Higher available SNR at 3T in combination with multi-coil technology and accelerated parallel acquisition, result in acquisition of nearly isotropic submillimeter 3D voxels throughout the entire peripheral arterial tree with diagnostic image quality and favorable comparative analysis with catheter angiography.
A system for automatically extracting image content features was developed that combines registration to a labeled atlas with natural language processing of free-text radiology reports. The system was then tested with T1-weighted, spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies of the brain performed in nine patients. The locations of 599 structures were visually assessed by an experienced radiologist and compared with the locations indicated by automated output. The in-plane accuracy of the contours was subjectively evaluated as either good, moderate, or poor. The criterion for classifying a structure as correctly located was that 90% or more of all the images containing the structure had to be correctly identified. For 98% of the structures, the images identified by the automated algorithm agreed with those identified by the radiologist, and in 83% of cases, image contours showed a good in-plane overlap. The results of this validation study demonstrate that this combination of registration and natural language processing is accurate in identifying relevant images from brain MR imaging studies. However, the range of applicability of this technique has yet to be determined by applying the technique to a large number of studies.
Renal hilar velocity waveforms, measured using non-breath-hold MR phase-contrast techniques with or without an ACE inhibitor, are insufficiently accurate to use in predicting renal artery stenosis.
The purpose of this work was to evaluate three volumetric registration methods in terms of technique, user-friendliness and time requirements. CT and SPECT data from 1 1 patients were interactively registered using: a 3D method involving only affmne transformation; a mixed 3D-2D non-affine (warping) method; and a 3D non-affine (warping) method. In the first method representative isosurfaces are generated from the anatomical images. Registration proceeds through translation, rotation, and scaling in all three space variables. Resulting isosurfaces are fused and quantitative measurements are possible. In the second method, the 3D volumes are rendered co-planar by performing a oblique projection. Corresponding landmark pairs are chosen on matching axial slice sets. A polynomial warp is then applied. This method has undergone extensive validation and was used to evaluate the results. The third method employs visualization tools. The data model allows images to be localized within two separate volumes. Landmarks are chosen on separate slices. Polynomial warping coefficients are generated and data points from one volume are moved to the corresponding new positions. The two landmark methods were the least time consuming (1 0 to 30 minutes from start to finish), but did demand a good knowledge of anatomy. The affine method was tedious and required a fair understanding of 3D geometry.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.