These prospective data emphasise (1) a highly inefficient use of acute hospital beds; (2) the need for step-down facilities; (3) efficient use of existing hospital beds is the highest priority both for optimal patient care and optimal use of expensive hospital resources; (4) efficient use of existing facilities should be achieved before the construction of additional facilities.

As the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic continues to spread, the necessity for rapid, easy diagnostic capabilities could never have been more crucial. With this aim in mind, we have developed a cost-effective and time-saving testing methodology/strategy that implements a sensitive reverse transcriptase loop-mediated amplification (RT-LAMP) assay within narrow, commercially available and cheap, glass capillaries for detection of the SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA. The methodology is compatible with widely used laboratory-based molecular testing protocols and currently available infrastructure. It employs a simple rapid extraction protocol that lyses the virus, releasing sufficient genetic material for amplification. This extracted viral RNA is then amplified using a SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP kit, at a constant temperature and the resulting amplified product produces a colour change which can be visually interpreted. This testing protocol, in conjunction with the RT-LAMP assay, has a sensitivity of ∼100 viral copies per reaction of a sample and provides results in a little over thirty minutes. As the assay is carried out in a water bath, commonly available within most testing laboratories, it eliminates the need for specialised instruments and associated skills. In addition, our testing pathway requires a significantly reduced quantity of reagents per test while providing comparable sensitivity and specificity to the RT-LAMP kit used in this study. While the conventional technique requires 25μl of reagent, our test only utilises less than half the quantity (10 μl). Thus, with its minimalistic approach, this capillary-based assay could be a promising alternative to the conventional testing, owing to the fact that it can be performed in resource-limited settings, using readily available apparatus, and has the potential of increasing the overall testing capacity, while also reducing the burden on supply chains for mass testing.

Background: Skin is the largest organ in the body, representing an important interface to monitor health and disease. However, there is significant variation in skin properties for different ages, genders and body regions due to the differences in the structure and morphology of the skin tissues. This study aimed to evaluate the use of noninvasive tools to discriminate a range of mechanical and functional skin parameters from different skin sites. Materials and methods:A cohort of 15 healthy volunteers was recruited following appropriate informed consent. Four well-established CE-marked non-invasive techniques were used to measure four anatomical regions: palm, forearm, sole and lower lumbar L3, using a repeated measures design. Skin parameters included transepidermal water loss (TEWL), pH (acidity), erythema, stratum corneum hydration and stiffness and elasticity using Myoton Pro (skin and muscle probe). Differences between body locations for each parameter and the intra-rater reliability between days were evaluated by the same operator. Results:The results indicate that parameters differed significantly between skin sites.For the Myoton skin probe, the sole recorded the highest stiffness value of 1006 N/m (SD ± 179), while the lower lumbar recorded the least value of 484 N/m (SD ± 160). The muscle indenter Myoton probe revealed the palm's highest value of 754 N/m (± 108), and the lower lumbar recorded the least value of 208 N/m (SD ± 44). TEWL values were lowest on the forearm, averaging 11 g/m2/h, and highest on the palm, averaging 41 g/m2/h. Similar skin hydration levels were recorded in three of the four sites, with the main difference being observed in the sole averaging 13 arbitrary units. Erythema values were characterised by a high degree of inter-subject variation, and no significant differences between sites or sides were observed. The Myoton Pro Skin showed excellent reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients > 0.70) for all sites with exception of one site right lower back; the Myoton pro muscle probes showed good to poor reliability (0.90-017), the corneometer showed excellent reliability (>0.75) among all the sites tested, and the TEWL showed Good to poor reliability (0.74-0.4) among sites.

No abstract

No abstract