Background and Aims: Motor chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare poorly described subtype of CIDP. We aimed to study the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics and as response to treatment. Methods: From a prospective database of CIDP patients, we included patients with definite or probable CIDP with motor signs and without sensory signs/symptoms at diagnosis. Patients were considered to have pure motor CIDP (PM-CIDP) if sensory conductions were normal or to have motor predominant CIDP (MPred-CIDP) if ≥2 sensory nerve action potential amplitude were abnormal. Results: Among the 700 patients with CIDP, 17 (2%) were included (PM-CIDP n=7, MPred-CIDP n=10); 71% were male, median age at onset was 48 years (range:13-76 years), 47% had an associated inflammatory or infectious disease or neoplasia. At the more severe disease stage, 94% of patients had upper and lower limb weakness, with distal and proximal weakness in 4 limbs for 56% of them. Three-quarters (75%) responded to intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) and 4/5 patients to corticosteroids including 3/3 patients with MPred-CIDP. The most frequent conduction abnormalities were conduction blocks (CB, 82%) and F-wave abnormalities (88%). During follow-up, 4/10 MPred-CIDP patients developed mild sensory symptoms; none with PM-CIDP did so. Patients with PM-CIDP had poorer outcome (median ONLS:4, range:2-5) compared to MPred-CIDP (2, range:0-4;p=0.03) at last follow-up. Conclusions: The present study found a progressive clinical course in the majority of patients with motor CIDP as well as frequent associated diseases, CB, and F-wave abnormalities. Corticosteroids might be considered as a therapeutic option in resistant IVIg patients with MPred-CIDP.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.