Heterotopic ossification is a condition characterized by the presence of mature lamellar bone and often bone marrow in soft tissues surrounding a major joint. It represents a common complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The etiology and predisposing factors are not completely known, but some authors reported that the implant of a non-cemented prosthesis seems to be associated with a greater incidence of HO. Two hundred and two non-cemented total hip arthroplasties were performed between October 1997 and February 2002. The mean age was 70.2 years. The average follow-up for 181 hips included in the study was 96 months (range, 72-120 months). A standard lateral approach (Hardinge) was performed for the implant of a non-cemented femoral component and a non-cemented acetabular component. Radiographs were done before and after surgery, at 1, 4 and 12 months postop, then every year. The incidence of HO was assessed in the antero-posterior view at each interval and graded according to Brooker classification. Out of 181 implants, HO was observed in 52 hips (28,7%). Heterotopic bone was graded as class I in 32 (17.7%) hips, class II in 14 (7.73%) hips, class III in 6 (3,3%) hips and class IV in none (0%). The mean preoperative Harris hip score was 48; at the last follow-up, the mean postoperative score was preoperatively to a mean of 89 points (range, 76-97 points) in HO Hip and of 91 points (range, 78-100 points) in the other Hip. In our experience, non-cemented THA led to a higher incidence of class I and II HO according to Brooker Classification, the incidence of HO is comparable to the rates reported in recent studies about the HO finding after a non-cemented THA, the importance of clinical symptoms in the presence of HO is very low.
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJi) remains one of the most challenging complications after joint arthroplasty. Despite improvements in surgical techniques and in the use of antibiotic prophylaxis, it remains a major cause of implant failure and need for revision. PJi is associated with both human host-related and bacterial agentrelated factors that can interact in all the phases of the procedure (preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative). Prevention is the first strategy to implement in order to minimize this catastrophic complication. the present review focuses on the preoperative period, and on what to do once risk factors are fully understood and have been identified.
Impaired autophagy, responsible for increased inflammation, constitutes a risk factor for the more severe COVID-19 outcomes. Spermidine (SPD) is a known autophagy modulator and supplementation for COVID-19 risk groups (including the elderly) is recommended. However, information on the modulatory effects of eugenol (EUG) is scarce. Therefore, the effects of SPD and EUG, both singularly and in combination, on autophagy were investigated using different cell lines (HBEpiC, SHSY5Y, HUVEC, Caco-2, L929 and U937). SPD (0.3 mM), EUG (0.2 mM) and 0.3 mM SPD + 0.2 mM EUG, significantly increased autophagy using the hallmark measure of LC3-II protein accumulation in the cell lines without cytotoxic effects. Using Caco-2 cells as a model, several crucial autophagy proteins were upregulated at all stages of autophagic flux in response to the treatments. This effect was verified by the activation/differentiation and migration of U937 monocytes in a three-dimensional reconstituted intestinal model (Caco-2, L929 and U937 cells). Comparable benefits of SPD, EUG and SPD + EUG in inducing autophagy were shown by the protection of Caco-2 and L929 cells against lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation. SPD + EUG is an innovative dual therapy capable of stimulating autophagy and reducing inflammation in vitro and could show promise for COVID-19 risk groups.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.