Surgical repair of oesophageal atresia may result in anastomotic strictures. These strictures are often treated by balloon dilatation (BD) and currently balloon dilatation (fluoroscopic or endoscopic) is the preferred primary treatment method. Here we review the current evidence of the outcomes of balloon dilatation of anastomotic strictures secondary to surgical repair of oesophageal atresia. We searched the standard databases (January, 1960-May, 2012) to identify all studies that reported outcomes of balloon dilatation of anastomotic strictures secondary to surgical repair of oesophageal atresia in children. Data, reported as median (range), were analysed and compared. Outcomes were success of BD, number of BD sessions, number of oesophageal perforations, need for other surgical interventions and mortality. Five studies were found to be relevant (n = 139; 81 [58%] male children). The total number of dilatation sessions was 401 (2.9 dilatations per child patient). General anaesthesia was used in two (40%) studies; sedation in a further two (40%) studies and one (20%) study used a combination of both. The size of balloon catheter ranged from 4 mm to 22 mm. Seven perforations were reported (1.8% per dilatation session), of which only one (14%) required surgery. No deaths were recorded. Balloon dilatation for anastomotic strictures post-EA repair is safe, and associated with a low perforation and mortality rates. Most perforations are amenable to conservative management.
Many extra-ocular, orbital neoplasms are amenable to ultrasound-guided tissue sampling and the procedure is well tolerated. However, a clear understanding of orbital anatomy, differential diagnosis and technique is required to enable safe sampling. Furthermore, a collaborative, multimodality approach is imperative for optimal patient management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.