No abstract

Since the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 became available in January 2020, new vaccines have been developed at an unprecedented speed. The current vaccines have been directly associated with a decline in new infection rates, prevention of severe disease and an outstanding decrease in mortality rates. However, the pandemic is still far from being over. New Variants of Concern (VoCs) are continuously evolving. Thus, it is essential to develop accessible second-generation COVID-19 vaccines against known and future VoCs to mitigate the current pandemic. Here, we provide preclinical data showing the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety results in mice of a receptor-binding domain (RBD)-based recombinant protein vaccine candidate (PHH-1V) which consists of a novel RBD fusion heterodimer containing the B.1.1.7 (alpha) and B.1.351 (beta) variants of SARS-CoV-2, formulated with an oil-based adjuvant equivalent to MF59C.1. BALB/c and K18-hACE2 mice were immunized with different doses of recombinant RBD fusion heterodimer, following a two-dose prime-and-boost schedule. Upon 20 μg RBD fusion heterodimer/dose immunization, BALB/c mice produced RBD-binding antibodies with neutralising activity against the alpha, beta, gamma, and delta variants. Furthermore, vaccination elicited robust activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells with early expression of Th1 cytokines upon in vitro restimulation, along with a good tolerability profile. Importantly, vaccination with 10 μg or 20 μg RBD fusion heterodimer/dose conferred 100% efficacy preventing mortality and bodyweight loss upon SARS-CoV-2 challenge in K18-hACE2 mice. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of this novel recombinant vaccine strategy, allowing the inclusion of up to 2 different RBD proteins in the same vaccine. Most importantly, this new platform is easy to adapt to future VoCs and has a good stability profile, thus ensuring its global distribution.

SummaryBackgroundA SARS-CoV-2 protein-based heterodimer vaccine, PHH-1V, has been shown to be safe and well-tolerated in healthy young adults in a first-in-human, Phase I/IIa study dose-escalation trial. Here, we report the interim results of the Phase IIb HH-2, where the immunogenicity and safety of a heterologous booster with PHH-1V is assessed versus a homologous booster with BNT162b2 at 14 and 98 days after vaccine administration.MethodsThe HH-2 study is an ongoing multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority Phase IIb trial, where participants 18 years or older who had received two doses of BNT162b2 were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive a booster dose of vaccine – either heterologous (PHH-1V group) or homologous (BNT162b2 group) – in 10 centres in Spain. Eligible subjects were allocated to treatment stratified by age group (18-64 versus ≥65 years) with approximately 10% of the sample enrolled in the older age group. The endpoints were humoral immunogenicity measured by changes in levels of neutralizing antibodies against the ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 strain and different variants of SARS-CoV-2 after the PHH-1V or the BNT162b2 boost, the T-cell responses towards the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein peptides and the safety and tolerability of PHH-1V as a boost. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05142553.FindingsFrom 15 November 2021, 782 adults were randomly assigned to PHH-1V (n=522) or BNT162b2 (n=260) boost vaccine groups. The geometric mean titre (GMT) ratio of neutralizing antibodies on days 14 and 98, shown as BNT162b2 active control versus PHH-1V, was, respectively, 1·68 (p<0·0001) and 0·87 (p=0·43) for the ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 strain; 0·61 (p<0·0001) and 0·57 (p=0·0064) for the beta variant; 1·01 (p=0·89) and 0·52 (p=0·0003) for the delta variant; and 0·59 (p=<0·0001) and 0·56 (p=0·0026) for the omicron variant. Additionally, PHH-1V as a booster dose induced a significant increase of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells expressing IFN-γ on day 14. There were 458 participants who experienced at least one adverse event (89·3%) in the PHH-1V and 238 (94·4%) in the BNT162b2 group. The most frequent adverse events were injection site pain (79·7% and 89·3%), fatigue (27·5% and 42·1%) and headache (31·2 and 40·1%) for the PHH-1V and the BNT162b2 groups, respectively. A total of 52 COVID-19 cases occurred from day 14 post-vaccination (10·14%) for the PHH-1V group and 30 (11·90%) for the BNT162b2 group (p=0·45), and none of the subjects developed severe COVID-19.InterpretationOur interim results from the Phase IIb HH-2 trial show that PHH-1V as a heterologous booster vaccine, when compared to BNT162b2, elicits a strong and sustained neutralizing antibody response against Wuhan-Hu-1 strain, and a superior one concerning the previous circulating beta and delta SARS-CoV-2 variants, as well as the currently circulating omicron. Moreover, the PHH-1V boost also induces a strong and balanced T-cell response. Concerning the safety profile, subjects in the PHH-1V group report significantly fewer adverse events than those in the BNT162b2 group, most of mild intensity, and both vaccine groups present comparable COVID-19 breakthrough cases, none of them severe.FundingHIPRA SCIENTIFIC, S.L.U.

No abstract

No abstract