No abstract

Objectives: Arterio-ureteralfistula (AUF) is an infrequent but potentially life-threatening condition. The aim of this study was reviewing the literature to build a flow-chart useful for an early and effective diagnosis and treatment of this pathology.Materials and methods: A literature search in PubMed was con-ducted. In addition, retrieved articles were cross-referenced. Data parameters included oncologic, vascular and urological history, diagnostics, treatment, and follow up were collected using a standard template by 2 independent reviewers. Results: A total of 140 cases of AUF out of 172 available in the literature at the time of the review, were considered. All patients presented gross hematuria. Chronic indwelling ureteral catheter (CIUC); history of pelvic surgery (HPS) and history of pelvic radiotherapy (HRT) were present respectively in 81%, 62.1%and 58.6% of the sample. The most predominant location of AUF was at the common iliac artery ureteral crossing. Angiography with provocative measures had the highest diag-nostic sensitivity (50%) and endovascular treatment with stent-graft placement across the fistula is the current state of the art treatment choice.Conclusions: Failure to diagnose can postpone a potentially life-saving targeted therapy and lead to complications. The identifi-cation of the Trifecta hematuria, history of pelvic surgery (HPS) and history of pelvic radiotherapy (HPR) would allow the identi-fication of patients at high risk of AUF, who may benefit from more sensitive early diagnostic investigations such as CT angiography and provocative angiography. The treatment of choice in case of AUF to date consist in endovascular prosthesis placement.

Objective: To present a retrospective analysis on the oncological and functional outcomes of a single-center experience on a large series of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (eLRP) with an extended follow-up. Materials and methods: Herein we present a retrospective review of patients who underwent eLRP. Oncological and functional follow-up data were collected by means of outpatient visits and telephone interviews, assessing overall mortality and biochemical recurrence-free survival. Patients with clinical T4 stage prostate cancer (PCa), previous surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), previous androgen deprivation, radiotherapy, concomitant chemotherapy and/or experimental therapies, and with insufficient follow-up data were excluded. Preoperative data recorded were age, body mass index, ultrasound prostate volume, preoperative PSA and clinical stage of PCa. Operative data (operative time, nerve sparing technique and any perioperative complication) and pathological findings were obtained by consulting the surgical and pathological reports. Oncological and functional follow-up were collected during follow-up visits and telephone interview. Results: Between January 2001 and December 2019, overall 938 eLRP were performed at our Institution. The median follow-up was 132 months. 69.7% of the patients had complete dataset. The estimated overall biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival was 71.4% at 5 years and 58.9% at 10 years. Cancer specific survival was 84,5%. Erectile function was preserved in the most of patients as postoperative IIEF-5 score within 12 months after surgery was > 12 in the 82.1%. About the urinary incontinence, 0.76% of the patients presented severe incontinence (continued and persistent loss of urine) and 7.0% were mildly incontinent (using up to one pad per day). Conclusions; eLRP has shown oncological and functional results comparable to other minimally invasive techniques and to open radical prostatectomy (ORP), with favorable perioperative outcomes than the open technique and a reduced complication rate.

No abstract

No abstract