Introduction
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is frequently observed in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We investigated the impact of preoperative MR on LVAD patients.
Methods
A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis of adult patients enrolled in the EUROMACS registry between 01/01/2011 and 30/11/2021 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the grade of preoperative MR: none-to-mild (MR 0-II) or moderate-to-severe (MR III-IV).
Results
Following 1:1 propensity score matching, each group consisted of 914 patients. Incidence of postoperative temporary right ventricular support, reoperation for bleeding, and dialysis was similar. MR III-IV demonstrated shorter median ICU stay (14 d [6; 27.8] vs 10 d [5; 22], p = 0.004) and ventilation time (72 h [22, 320] vs 31 h [18, 150], p < 0.001).
Mortality was lower for MR III-IV patients (SHR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.59–0.73, p < 0.001). The 1-year survival was 68.1% (95% CI: 65.1–71.3%) in MR 0-II and 75% (95% CI: 72.1–78%) in MR III-IV. A lower incidence of total complications (OR 0.93 [0.89–0.98], p = 0.003) and trend towards a lower risk of neurological dysfunction (SHR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.61–1.01, p = 0.063) and sustained ventricular tachycardia (OR 0.93 [0.54–1.03], p = 0.074) were demonstrated for MR III-IV. The risk of fatal stroke and pump thrombosis was similar.
Conclusion
Moderate-to-severe MR in patients undergoing LVAD implantation is associated with better mid-term survival and lower incidence of total major adverse events and complications. The incidence of severe postoperative complications including fatal stroke and device thrombosis was similar.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.