OBJECTIVES Our goal was to investigate whether the incidence of valve-related adverse events might be different depending on the valve substitute after valve replacement for left-sided native valve endocarditis. METHODS We assessed the long-term freedom from recurrence, reoperation and survival of 395 patients who had valve replacements for native valve endocarditis (314 mechanical vs 81 biological). Age <18 years, reoperation, prosthetic endocarditis, right valve involvement, valve repair and homograft implants were the main exclusion criteria. The balance between the 2 groups was addressed by weighting the results on the inverse of the propensity score. RESULTS After inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), freedom from recurrence of infective endocarditis was not significantly different (mechanical 84.1 ± 3.2% vs 50.6 ± 21.7%; P = 0.29) nor was freedom from reoperation different (mechanical 85.7 ± 3.1% vs biological 50.9 ± 21.9%; P = 0.29). Excluding competing deaths, patients receiving a bioprosthesis had a similar subdistribution hazard of the above end points compared to recipients of a mechanical valve [recurrence IPTW: hazard ratio (HR) 1.631, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.756–3.516; P = 0.21; reoperation IPTW-HR 1.737, 95% CI 0.780–3.870; P = 0.18]. Mechanical valves were associated with improved long-term survival (34.9 ± 5.8% vs 10.5 ± 7.4% at 30 years; P = 0.0009; in particular: aortic valve subgroup 41.6 ± 9.3% vs 10.1 ± 8.2%; P < 0.0001), although the hazard of cardiovascular mortality did not favour either valve type (IPTW: HR 1.361, 95% CI 0.771–2.404; P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS Our analysis showed a clinical trend in favour of mechanical valves as valve substitutes for native valve endocarditis, especially in the aortic position. In view of long-term freedom from adverse events, the choice of the valve type should be tailored according to patient characteristics and specific clinical conditions.

OBJECTIVES Recently, increased length of the ascending aorta has been suggested as a possible risk factor for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). Our goal was to identify measurable aortic geometrical characteristics associated with elongation that could differentiate ATAAD from uncomplicated aortic dilation (>45 mm). METHODS In angiographic computed tomography scans performed in 180 patients having cardiac surgery, aortic diameters, root length, length of the ascending aorta at both the centreline and the greater curvature (convexity) and the root-ascending (root-asc) angle (that between the root axis and the axis of the ascending tract) and the ascending-arch (asc-arch) angle (that between the axis of the ascending aorta and the arch axis) were measured and compared among 3 patient groups: normal aorta (diameter < 45 mm), dilation/aneurysm (>45 mm) and ATAAD. Correlations between diameters and angles, diameters and lengths and lengths and angles were analysed; multivariable analysis including geometrical factors was performed to identify independent predictors of ATAAD. RESULTS Both patients with aneurysms and patients with ATAAD showed significantly elongated ascending aortas (P < 0.001 vs normal). However, in the aneurysms, the root-asc angle (136° ± 20° vs 147° ± 17°; P < 0.001) and in ATAAD the asc-arch angle were uniquely narrower than that in the normal aorta (116° ± 11° vs 132° ± 19°; P < 0.001). All patients with an ATAAD had an asc-arch angle ≤130°. Both in patients with ATAAD and in those without ATAAD, narrowing of the asc-arch angle was associated with elongation of the root segment (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the asc-arch angle and the total length of the ascending aorta (root + tubular) were significant predictors of ATAAD. CONCLUSIONS The asc-arch angle is a promising measurement that could help predict aortic dissection along with aortic diameter and length: further verification is warranted.

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is an indisputable emergency with very poor outcomes without surgical treatment. Although the aortic arch is often involved in the aortic dissection, its optimal management during surgical therapy remains uncertain. A conservative tear-oriented approach has traditionally been adopted, limiting the procedure to the ascending aorta (or hemiarch) replacement. However, dilation of the residual dissected aorta and subsequent rupture may occur, requiring further intervention in the future. In the last two decades, the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique has become a valid and attractive option to treat aortic disease when the arch and the thoracic aorta are involved, both in elective and in emergency settings. Here, we report a review of the contemporary literature regarding the short- and long-term outcomes of the FET technique in ATAAD repair.

Preoperative anemia has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery, but little is known about its prognostic value in the setting of redo procedure. A retrospective, observational cohort study of prospectively collected data was undertaken on 409 consecutive patients referred for redo cardiac procedures between January 2011 and December 2020. The EuroSCORE II calculated an average mortality risk of 25.7 ± 15.4%. Selection bias was assessed with the propensity-adjustment method. The prevalence of preoperative anemia was 41%. In unmatched analysis, significant differences between the anemic and nonanemic groups emerged in the risk for postoperative stroke (0.6% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.023), postoperative renal dysfunction (29.7% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.001), a need for prolonged ventilation (18.1% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.002), and high-dosage inotropes (53.1% vs. 32.9%, p < 0.001) along with both length of ICU and hospital stay (8.2 ± 15.9 vs. 4.3 ± 5.4 days, p = 0.003 and 18.8 ± 17.4 vs. 14.9 ± 11.1, p = 0.012). After propensity matching (145 pairs), preoperative anemia was still significantly associated with postoperative renal dysfunction, stroke, and the need for high-dosage inotrope cardiac morbidity. Preoperative anemia is significantly associated with acute kidney injury, stroke, and the need for high-dosage inotropes in patients referred for redo procedures.

Total anomalous pulmonary venous return due to septum primum malposition is a poorly understood condition despite being very common in left atrial isomerism or polysplenia syndrome. Due to the leftward displacement of the septum primum, either the two right pulmonary veins or all four pulmonary veins can drain abnormally into the right atrium, despite their correct position. In other words, the four pulmonary veins (or the two right pulmonary veins), looking from outside the heart, return at the back of the atrium in the normal position. Nevertheless, from the inside of the heart, two or all four pulmonary veins drain into the right atrium due to the leftward displacement of the septum primum. As an example, we report a 5-month-old patient with severe malposition of the septum primum and consequent total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage into the right atrium. The patient underwent surgical correction with resection of the malpositioned septum primum and reconstruction of a normal interatrial septation with a pericardial patch.