Background Since 2005, artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) has been recommended to treat uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Madagascar. Artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) are the first- and second-line treatments, respectively. A therapeutic efficacy study was conducted to assess ACT efficacy and molecular markers of anti-malarial resistance. Methods Children aged six months to 14 years with uncomplicated falciparum malaria and a parasitaemia of 1000–100,000 parasites/µl determined by microscopy were enrolled from May–September 2018 in a 28-day in vivo trial using the 2009 World Health Organization protocol for monitoring anti-malarial efficacy. Participants from two communes, Ankazomborona (tropical, northwest) and Matanga (equatorial, southeast), were randomly assigned to ASAQ or AL arms at their respective sites. PCR correction was achieved by genotyping seven neutral microsatellites in paired pre- and post-treatment samples. Genotyping assays for molecular markers of resistance in the pfk13, pfcrt and pfmdr1 genes were conducted. Results Of 344 patients enrolled, 167/172 (97%) receiving ASAQ and 168/172 (98%) receiving AL completed the study. For ASAQ, the day-28 cumulative PCR-uncorrected efficacy was 100% (95% CI 100–100) and 95% (95% CI 91–100) for Ankazomborona and Matanga, respectively; for AL, it was 99% (95% CI 97–100) in Ankazomborona and 83% (95% CI 76–92) in Matanga. The day-28 cumulative PCR-corrected efficacy for ASAQ was 100% (95% CI 100–100) and 98% (95% CI 95–100) for Ankazomborona and Matanga, respectively; for AL, it was 100% (95% CI 99–100) in Ankazomborona and 95% (95% CI 91–100) in Matanga. Of 83 successfully sequenced samples for pfk13, no mutation associated with artemisinin resistance was observed. A majority of successfully sequenced samples for pfmdr1 carried either the NFD or NYD haplotypes corresponding to codons 86, 184 and 1246. Of 82 successfully sequenced samples for pfcrt, all were wild type at codons 72–76. Conclusion PCR-corrected analysis indicated that ASAQ and AL have therapeutic efficacies above the 90% WHO acceptable cut-off. No genetic evidence of resistance to artemisinin was observed, which is consistent with the clinical outcome data. However, the most common pfmdr1 haplotypes were NYD and NFD, previously associated with tolerance to lumefantrine.

Background: Since 2005, artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) has been recommended to treat uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Madagascar. Artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) are the first- and second-line treatments, respectively. A therapeutic efficacy study was conducted to assess ACT efficacy and molecular markers of antimalarial resistance.Methods: Children aged six months through 14 years with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria and a parasitemia of 1,000—100,000 parasites/µl determined by microscopy were enrolled from May—September 2018 in a 28-day in vivo trial using the 2009 World Health Organization protocol for monitoring antimalarial efficacy. Participants from two communes, Ankazomborona (tropical, northwest) and Matanga (equatorial, southeast), were randomly assigned to ASAQ or AL arms. PCR correction was achieved by genotyping seven neutral microsatellites in paired pre- and post-treatment samples. Genotyping assays for molecular markers of resistance in the pfk13, pfcrt, and pfmdr1 genes were conducted.Results: Of 344 patients enrolled, 164/170 (96%) receiving ASAQ and 170/174 (98%) receiving AL completed the study. For ASAQ, the day-28 cumulative PCR-uncorrected efficacy was 100% (95% CI 100–100) and 95% (95% CI 91–100) for Ankazomborona and Matanga, respectively; for AL, it was 99% (95% CI 97–100) in Ankazomborona and 84% (95% CI 76–92) in Matanga. The day-28 cumulative PCR-corrected efficacy for ASAQ was 100% (95% CI 100–100) and 97% (95% CI 94–100%) for Ankazomborona and Matanga, respectively; for AL, it was 100% (95% CI 99–100) in Ankazomborona and 96% (95% CI 91–100) in Matanga. Of 83 successfully sequenced samples for pfk13, no mutations associated with artemisinin resistance were observed. A majority of successfully sequenced samples for pfmdr1 carried either the NFD or NYD haplotypes corresponding to codons 86, 184, and 1246. Of 82 successfully sequenced samples for pfcrt, all were wild type at codons 72–76. Conclusion: PCR-corrected analysis indicated that ASAQ and AL have therapeutic efficacies above the 90% WHO acceptable cut-off. We did not observe any genetic evidence of resistance to artemisinin, consistent with the clinical outcome data. However, the most common pfmdr1 haplotypes were NYD and NFD, previously associated with tolerance to lumefantrine.

Background There is currently no validated, effective, safe treatment for severe illness caused by SARS-CoV-2. CVO PLUS CURATIF (CVO+C) is a capsule formulation of two compounds of plant origin with anti-inflammatory and antiviral activities in vitro: artemisinin and 1,8-cineole. These compounds have been repurposed for possible use as an oral treatment against COVID-19. Methods We performed a phase 3 randomized clinical trials on patients over the age of 18 years with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by RT-PCR and mild-to-moderate symptoms. Patients were randomly assigned to receive CVO+C (3 capsules per day) or placebo for 15 days. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients testing negative for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR on day 28 and an absence of severe and serious adverse events. Recovery time, and biological parameters on days 7, 14, 21 and 28 of the trial were considered as secondary outcomes. The safety outcomes considered were adverse events on treatment. Results In total, 1,576 individuals underwent RT-PCR screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the study period. Positive test results were obtained for 591 subjects, 339 of whom met the inclusion criteria for this study. The final analysis included 339 subjects: 132 from the CVO+C arm and 144 from the placebo arm. Treatment efficacy differed significantly (p=0.011) between the CVO+C arm (87.1%, 95% CI: 81.3%-92.9%, with 70.45% of patients cured by day 14) and the placebo arm (75.0%, 95% CI: 67.8% - 82.1%), with an OR of 2.25. The median time to recovery was 14 days for the CVO+C group and 21 days for the placebo group. A total of 72 incidences of mild and moderate adverse events, 14 severe adverse events and no serious adverse events were observed in both groups. ConclusionCVO+C was effective for the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19. None of the patients in the CVO+C arm displayed progression to the severe form of COVID-19. Liver kidney and metabolic functions were preserved in all patients.Trial registration: Registered at Pan African Clinical Trials Registry: (No. PACTR202103601407640, date of approval: 24/03/2021) and approved by the ethics committee of the Ministry of Public Health of Madagascar (approval No. 216 MINSANP/SG/AGMED/CERBM, 17/12/2020)