<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Forearm fractures are one of the commonest injuries accounting for 40% of paediatric fractures with a refracture rate of nearly 5%. Forearm refractures are increasing probably due to poor bone mineralization as a result of decreased physical activity, Vitamin D deficiency. These are treated by conservative measures with closed reduction and casting or by surgical fixation with flexible nails or plates. There are no definitive guidelines for management of forearm refracture and implant removal.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> The study is aimed at the epidemiology, methods and difficulties of management and functional outcome of forearm refracture treatment. A prospective study of all the cases of forearm refracture who presented to our institution from 2010 to 2016 with refractures treated either by conservative methods or by IMN. All cases were followed up for 2 years and functional outcome was assessed serially according to price et-al criteria.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Our study contained 17 males and 8 females between 6 years and 14 years. 76% refractures occurred before 16 weeks and majority had only tricortical union at this time. 42% patients underwent surgical fixation following refracture. Price et al criteria showed excellent results in 72% of patients.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Forearm refractures in children can be treated both conservatively and surgically like a primary fracture depending on the indications but needs 2 to 3 more weeks of immobilization. A good functional outcome was obtained in majority of the cases. We suggest using splints till quadricortical union is achieved to prevent chances of refracture.</p>

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Medial epicondyle fracture is a common elbow injury in children. It is associated with elbow dislocation in many cases. Treatment of displaced medial epicondyle fracture with and without elbow dislocation is a debated topic. Surgical and non surgical methods are practiced with variable results.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Our study was a prospective study of medial epicondyle fractures treated by surgical fixation with k wires. We studied total of 24 cases out of which 15 had elbow dislocation. The study period was from 2012 to 2015 and indications for surgery were displacement more than 5 mm, elbow instability, incarceration of fragment, ulnar nerve irritation. Open reduction and internal fixation with K wire done. We used joystick method while reducing the fragment with k wire which was a great help. We assessed the cases using mayo elbow performance score.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Our study yielded excellent results in 92% of patients (mayo elbow performance score &gt;90). There was no major difference in clinical outcome between two groups of patients. Complications like instability and non-union not seen following surgical fixation with K wires. The mean loss of flexion, extension, supination, and pronation was 4, 5, 3 and 2 degrees respectively with elbow dislocation group and 2, 3, 1, 1 in without dislocation group. Pre op instability seen in 54% patients was absent in follow up period. Stiffness was more in elbow dislocation group but overall performance was almost equal.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Surgical fixation of medial epicondyle fractures yields excellent results and may be advisable when indicated.</p>