Non‐T2 asthma is traditionally defined as asthma without features of T2 asthma. The definition is arbitrary and is generally based on the presence of neutrophils in sputum, or the absence (or normal levels) of eosinophils or other T2 markers in sputum (paucigranulocytic), airway biopsies or in blood. This definition may be imprecise as we gain more knowledge from applying transcriptomics and proteomics to blood and airway samples. The prevalence of non‐T2 asthma is also difficult to estimate as most studies are cross‐sectional and influenced by concomitant treatment with glucocorticosteroids, and by the presence of recognized or unrecognized airway infections. No specific therapies have shown any clinical benefits in patients with asthma that is associated with a non‐T2 inflammatory process. It remains to be seen if such an endotype truly exists and to identify treatments to target that endotype. Meanwhile, identifying intense airway neutrophilia as an indicator of airway infection and airway hyperresponsiveness as an indicator of smooth muscle dysfunction, and treating them appropriately, and not increasing glucocorticosteroids in patients who do not have obvious T2 inflammation, seem reasonable.

BackgroundIn clinical trials, the two anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs, mepolizumab and reslizumab) that are approved to treat severe eosinophilic asthma, reduce exacerbations by approximately 50–60%.ObjectiveTo observe response to anti-IL-5 mAbs in real-life clinical setting, and to evaluate predictors of sub-optimal response.MethodsIn four Canadian academic centres, pre-defined clinical end-points in 250 carefully characterised moderate-to-severe asthmatics were collected prospectively to assess response to the two anti-IL-5 mAbs. Sub-optimal responses was determined based on failure to reduce maintenance corticosteroid (MCS) or asthma symptoms scores (ACQ) or exacerbations, in addition to persistence of sputum/blood eosinophils. Worsening in suboptimal responders were assessed based on reduced lung function by 25% or any increase in MCS/ACQ. A representative sub-set of 39 patients were evaluated for inflammatory mediators, autoantibodies and complement activation in sputum (by ELISA) and for immune-complex deposition by immunostaining formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sputum plugs.ResultsSub-optimal responses were observed in 42.8% (107/250) patients treated with either mepolizumab/reslizumab. Daily prednisone requirement, sinus disease, and late-onset asthma diagnoses were the strongest predictors of sub-optimal response. Asthma worsened in 13% (34/250) of these patients. Majority (79%) of them were prednisone-dependent. Presence of sputum anti-eosinophil peroxidase immunoglobulin (Ig)G was a predictor of sub-optimal response to an anti-IL-5 mAb. An increase in sputum C3c (marker of complement activation) and deposition of C1q-bound/IL-5-bound IgG were observed in the sputa of those patients who worsened on therapy, suggesting an underlying autoimmune-mediated pathology.ConclusionA significant number of patients who meet currently approved indications for anti-IL5 mAbs show sub-optimal response to them in real-life clinical practice. Monitoring blood eosinophil count is not helpful to identify these patients. The concern of worsening of symptoms associated with immune-complex mediated complement-activation in a small proportion of these patients highlights the relevance of recognising airway autoimmune phenomena and this requires further evaluation.

No abstract