No abstract

Background Multiple trials have compared reconstruction techniques used following the resection of distal rectal cancers, including straight colorectal anastomosis (SCA), colonic J pouch (CJP), side-to-end anastomosis (SEA), and transverse coloplasty (TCP). The latest meta-analysis on the subject concluded that all the reservoir techniques produce equally good surgical and functional outcomes compared with SCA. Numerous trials have been published in this regard subsequently. Hence, a network analysis (NMA) was performed to rank these techniques. Methods A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from their inception until April 2021 was conducted to identify randomized trials. Functional and surgical outcome data were pooled. ORs and standardized mean differences (MDs) were used as pooled effect size measures. A frequentist NMA model was used. Results Thirty-two trials met the eligibility criteria comprising 3072 patients. CJP showed better functional outcomes, such as low stool frequency and better incontinence score, both in the short term (stool frequency, MD −2.06, P < 0.001; incontinence, MD −1.17, P = 0.007) and intermediate term (stool frequency, MD −0.81, P = 0.021; incontinence MD −0.56, P = 0.083). Patients with an SEA (long-term OR 4.37; P = 0.030) or TCP (long-term OR 5.79; P < 0.001) used more antidiarrheal medications constantly. The urgency and sensation of incomplete evacuation favoured CJP in the short term. TCP was associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leakage (OR 12.85; P < 0.001) and stricture (OR 3.21; P = 0.012). Conclusion Because of its better functional outcomes, CJP should be the reconstruction technique of choice. TCP showed increased anastomotic leak and stricture rates, warranting judicious use.

No abstract

Following esophagectomy, anatomical reconstruction with a gastric tube is the most common practice. The construction of the gastric tube is done with staplers nowadays, be it a minimally invasive esophagectomy or a conventional open surgery. Even though anastomotic leak and conduit necrosis are reported widely in the literature, the number of studies on staple line dehiscence is meager in comparison. Management of conduit failure usually sacrifices conduit combined with a diverting cervical esophagostomy. We report a case of successful surgical management of a big staple line dehiscence and 'salvaging of the conduit'.

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) involving the gastrointestinal tract is exceptionally rare, except in the esophagus and the anal canal. In the hindgut, a common site of involvement is the colo-rectum, commonly seen in the fifth decade of life. The presentation is usually in the advanced stages and carries a poor prognosis. Due to the rarity of the disease, before labeling it as a primary lesion, the possibility of metastasis from a distant primary should be entertained. Consensus guidelines regarding the management of such a rare condition are lacking. Here, we present the case of an elderly gentleman with a history of surgery for urinary bladder cancer 20 years back (the nature of which is not known). The patient presented with left lower abdominal pain and altered bowel habits. His pain had persisted for approximately two months along with a recent onset of overflow incontinence but no other associated constitutional symptoms. Examination revealed pallor and a vague abdominal mass in the left iliac fossa. On further evaluation with a colonoscopy, a growth was seen in the sigmoid colon. Computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a locally invasive growth arising from the sigmoid colon along with a space-occupying lesion in the left lobe of the liver enhancing on the portal phase. Biopsy from the sigmoid and the liver lesion was reported as SCC which was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Given the metastatic nature of the lesion, treatment options were discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting, and the decision was made to proceed with diversion colostomy and palliative chemotherapy. SCC of the colon is a rare disease and is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage. Even in operable cases, the prognosis is dismal, and various treatment modalities have been attempted. Due to the rarity of the disease and paucity of data regarding definitive management, treatment varies from one patient to another.