Herein, the compositional families Sr1−xCexMnO3 (SCMX, X = 100x, x = 0.10, 0.20, and 0.30) and CexSr2−xMnO4 (CSMX, X = 100x, x = 0.10, 0.20, and 0.30) are studied to determine the effects of perovskite structure and cerium content on thermal reduction thermodynamics and the resulting impact on solar thermochemical hydrogen production (STCH). Relying on thermogravimetric results from oxygen nonstoichiometry experiments, fits for various thermodynamic quantities are produced, including defect‐reaction specific enthalpy ( and entropy (), as well as the δ‐dependent standard partial molar enthalpy, , and entropy , of oxygen as a function of composition within these two perovskite families. The results of this thermodynamic study are also discussed in the context of structure and cerium dopant level. Experimental hydrogen production results show that the SCM family produces slightly larger amounts of hydrogen per mole of oxide compared with the CSM family under similar reduction and oxidation temperature conditions, however, a direct correlation between structure, cerium content, and water‐splitting capacity could not be discerned.

As combinatorial and computational methods accelerate the identification of potentially suitable thermochemically-active oxides for use in solar thermochemical hydrogen production (STCH), the onus shifts to quickly evaluating predicted performance. Traditionally, this has required an experimental setup capable of directly carrying out a two-stage thermochemical water-splitting process. But this can be a difficult endeavor, as most off-the-shelf equipment cannot adequately deal simultaneously with the high temperatures, varying oxygen partial pressures, and high H2O partial pressures required; achieving sufficient temporal sensitivity to accurately quantify the kinetics is also a major challenge. However, as proposed here, a less complicated experiment can be used as a first screening for thermochemical water splitting potential. Temperature-Programmed Thermal Redox (TPTR) using thermogravimetry evaluates the thermal reduction behavior of materials. This technique does not require water splitting or CO2-splitting analogs but can nonetheless predict water-splitting performance. Three figures of merit are obtained from the TPTR experiment: reduction onset temperature, extent of reduction, and extent of recovery upon reoxidation. These metrics can collectively be used to determine if a material is capable of thermochemical water-splitting, and, to good approximation, predict whether the thermodynamics are favorable for use under more challenging high-conversion conditions. This paper discusses the pros and cons of using TPTR and proposes a protocol for use within the STCH community.