Background:Anesthesia and surgery-induced neuroendocrine stress response can be modulated by appropriate premedication. The present study was designed to assess the clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl premedication for modulation of neuroendocrine stress response by analyzing the perioperative variation of blood glucose level during laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.Subjects and Methods:In a prospective randomized double-blind study, 60 adult consented patients of either sex with ASA I and II, scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia and meeting the inclusion criteria, were allocated into two groups. Group D patients (n = 30) were given intravenous dexmedetomidine 1μg/kg and Group F patients (n = 30) received fentanyl 2 μg/kg, given over a 10-min period, before induction of anesthesia. Perioperative blood glucose levels were analyzed preoperatively, at 30 min after beginning of surgery, and 2.5 h after surgery. Anesthetic and surgical techniques were standardized. All patients were also assessed for intraoperative hemodynamic changes of heart rate and mean arterial pressure at specific timings.Results:Blood glucose concentration has shown 20% increase after surgery. The differences between groups were not statistically significant as observed by analyzing the variation of serial perioperative blood glucose estimation. Both premedicants had attenuated the hemodynamic and neuroendocrine stress response of pneumoperitoneum and general anesthesia. The dexmedetomidine group showed more stabilization of intraoperative hemodynamics of mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate when compared to fentanyl group.Conclusion:During the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, dexmedetomidine and fentanyl, both premedicants have effectively modulated the neuroendocrine stress response of general anesthesia as assessed by analysis of perioperative blood glucose variation, but dexmedetomidine was better.

Background:Ropivacaine has less systemic toxicity and greater differentiation of sensory and motor blockade after subarachnoid block. This study was aimed to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine alone or with fentanyl in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostrate.Materials and Methods:Fifty four elderly consented patients of ASA grade I-III scheduled for transurethral resection of prostrate under the subarachnoid block were randomized to receive either intrathecal 4 mL of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine (Group R, n = 27) or 3.5 mL of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine with 0.5 mL (25 μg) of fentanyl (Group RF, n = 27). The characteristics of sensory and motor blockade, intraoperative hemodynamic changes, and secondary effects were noted for evaluation.Results:There was no significant difference in the demographic profile of patients. The surgical anesthesia was adequate for TURP surgery in all patients. The median time to achieve the sensory blockade at T10 dermatome was 3.2 ± 1.5 min in Group R and 3.5 ± 1.3 min in Group RF. The median duration of sensory blockade at T10 was 130.6 ± 10.2 min in Group R and 175.8 ± 8.6 min in Group RF. The median duration of complete motor block was significantly shorter than the duration of sensory blockade (P < 0.001). There were fewer episodes of manageable hypotension in 5 patients of Group R and 11 patients of Group RF. No secondary effects have occurred in any patients.Conclusion:The intrathecal 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine alone or with fentanyl has provided effective surgical anesthesia for transurethral resection of prostrate and hemodynamic stability in elderly patients.

Background and Aims:Clonidine has been used as an adjuvant to local anesthetic to extend the duration of block. The present study was aimed to compare the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade of 0.75% ropivacaine alone or in combination with clonidine during ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper extremity surgeries under tourniquet.Materials and Methods:Sixty four adult American Society of Anesthesiologist grade 1 and 2 patients, scheduled for upper extremity surgeries were randomized to receive either 19.8 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine with 0.2 mL of normal saline (Group R) or 0.2 mL (30 μg) of clonidine (Group RC) in supraclavicular block. Onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade was compared. The hemodynamic variability, sedation, respiratory adequacy and any other adverse effects were also recorded.Result:Ultrasound helped to visualize the nerves, needle and spread of local anesthetic at the brachial plexus block site. There was no statistically significant difference in the onset of sensory and motor blockade between the groups. Surgical anesthesia was achieved at the mean time of 20 min in all patients. Prolonged post-operative analgesia (mean duration 956 min) was observed in RC group as compared with R group (736 min). No complication of technique or adverse effect of ropivacaine and clonidine was reported.Conclusion:Clonidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine for ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus enhanced duration of post-operative analgesia. There was no incidence of vessel puncture or pneumothorax.