Sunflower residues are considered a prominent renewable source for biogas production during anaerobic digestion (AD). However; the recalcitrant structure of this lignocellulosic substrate requires a pretreatment step for efficient biomass transformation and increased bioenergy output. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of alkaline pretreatment of various parts of the sunflower residues (e.g., heads and stalks) on their methane yield. Experimental data showed that pretreatment at mild conditions (55 °C; 24 h; 4 g NaOH 100 g−1 total solids) caused an increase in the biochemical methane potential (BMP) of both heads and stalks of the sunflower residues as determined in batch tests. The highest methane production (268.35 ± 0.11 mL CH4 g−1 volatile solids) was achieved from the pretreated sunflower head residues. Thereafter; the effect of alkaline pretreatment of sunflower head residues was assessed in continuous mode; using continuous stirred-tank reactors (CSTRs) under two operational phases. During the first phase; the CSTRs were fed with the liquid fraction produced from the pretreatment of sunflower heads. During the second phase; the CSTRs were fed with the whole slurry resulting from the pretreatment of sunflower heads (i.e., both liquid and solid fractions). In both operating phases; it was observed that the alkaline pretreatment of the sunflower head residues had a negligible (phase I) or even a negative effect on biogas production; which was contradictory to the results of the BMP tests. It seems that; during alkaline pretreatment; this part of the sunflower residues (heads) may release inhibitory compounds; which induce a negative effect on biogas production in the long term (e.g., during continuously run digesters such as CSTR) but not in the short-term (e.g., batch tests) where the effect of the inoculum may not permit the inhibition to be established.
Biogas plants have been started to expand recently in Greece and their positive contribution to the economy is evident. A typical case study is presented which focuses on the long-term monitoring (lasting for one year) of a 500 kW mesophilic biogas plant consisting of an one-stage digester. The main feedstock used was cow manure, supplemented occasionally with chicken manure, corn silage, wheat/ray silage, glycerine, cheese whey, molasses and olive mill wastewater. The mixture of the feedstocks was adjusted based on their availability, cost and biochemical methane potential. The organic loading rate (OLR) varied at 3.42 ± 0.23 kg COD m−3 day−1 (or 2.74 ± 0.18 kg VS m−3 day−1) and resulted in a stable performance in terms of specific biogas production rate (1.27 ± 0.12 m3 m−3 day−1), biogas yield (0.46 ± 0.05 m3 kg−1 VS, 55 ± 1.3% in methane) and electricity production rate (12687 ± 1140 kWh day−1). There were no problems of foaming, nor was there a need for trace metal addition. The digestate was used by the neighboring farmers who observed an improvement in their crop yield. The profit estimates per feedstock indicate that chicken manure is superior to the other feedstocks, while molasses, silages and glycerin result in less profit due to the long distance of the biogas plant from their production source. Finally, the greenhouse gas emissions due to the digestate storage in the open air seem to be minor (0.81% of the methane consumed).
BACKGROUND The growth of poultry farming has increased the amount of chicken manure (CM) being produced. In this study, CM was digested in a two‐stage anaerobic digestion (AD) system consisting of three leach bed reactors (LBRs) and a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) coupled with sedimentation tanks (anaerobic contact process). The accumulated biomass and supernatant from the sedimentation tank were returned to the CSTR and the LBRs, respectively, resulting in an almost closed (water) circuit process. In addition, zeolite was used as bulking agent and adsorbent for ammonia in the LBRs. RESULTS This study revealed that the methane yield remained on average at 0.17 NL g−1 of Volatile Solids (VS), corresponding to the 43% of the CM biochemical methane potential as determined in separate batch tests (0.40 NL g−1 VS). Electrical conductivity gradually increased from 22 to 26 mS cm−1; however, the ammonia nitrogen concentration was stable at 2.28 g L−1, which was attributed to zeolite used as LBRs' bulking agent. A preliminary design of a full‐scale LBR‐CSTR facility was conducted for a poultry farm growing one million broilers per year. Its CO2 footprint was evaluated based on literature indices. CONCLUSION The proposed facility has a capacity of 130 kW Combined Heat and Power (CHP) and a payback period of 8.6 years. In terms of GHG emissions, implementing the LBR‐CSTR system for biogas production could potentially reduce the CO2 footprint of the farm from 1.38 to 0.49 kg CO2 eq/head. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).
This study demonstrates the leachate characteristics derived from bench-scale leach-bed reactors (LBRs) filled with chicken manure (CM) and zeolite. Zeolite was used to maintain the necessary porosity for the leaching process and to adsorb ammonia. Fresh water was added for leachate production and removed daily, in order to estimate the readily leachable organic and nitrogen matter of the CM. Tests were conducted at two ratios of zeolite to bed (10% and 3.5% v/v CMbed). Other operating parameters studied were the amount of water added in the LBRs, the leachate recirculation rate, and the hydraulic retention time (HRT). A control LBR with river pebbles at a similar size and ratio (10% v/v) with zeolite was also studied. Some experiments were repeated with CM, which had different characteristics. Compared to the control test, the LBR with zeolite at 10% v/v yielded leachate with less NH3 and a higher biochemical methane potential (BMP). However, free ΝH3 in the control experiment was below the inhibition threshold, proving that zeolite contributes to the higher BMP of leachate, and that this effect is not only due to NH3 adsorption.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.