In this paper, we consider drops that are subjected to a gradually increasing lateral force and follow the stages of the motion of the drops. We show that the first time a drop slides as a whole is when the receding edge of the drop is pulled by the advancing edge (the advancing edge drags the receding edge). The generality of this phenomenon includes sessile and pendant drops and spans over various chemically and topographically different cases. Because this observation is true for both pendant and sessile cases, we exclude hydrostatic pressure as its reason. Instead, we explain it in terms of the wetting adaptation and interfacial modulus, that is, the difference in the energies of the solid interface at the advancing and receding edges. At the receding edge, a slight motion exposes to the air a recently wetted solid surface whose molecules had reoriented to the liquid and will take time to reorient back to the air. This results in a high surface energy at the solid–air interface which pulls on the triple line, that is, inhibits the motion of the receding edge. On the other hand, at the advancing edge, a slight advancement does not change the nature of the solid interfacial molecules outside the drop, and the advancing side’s sliding can continue. Moreover, the solid molecules under the drop at the advancing edge take time to reorient, and hence, their configuration is not yet adapted for the liquid and therefore not adapted for retention of the advancing edge. Therefore, in sliding-drop experiments, the advancing edge moves before the receding one, typically a few times before the receding edge moves. For the same reason, the last motion of the receding edge usually happens as a result of the advancing edge pulling on it.

The mucus blanket can trap foreign particles before they enter the lungs, while at the same time, it flows up to remove these particles. This manifests the dual nature of mucus: sticky, on one hand, and fluid, on the other. Inspired by this function of mucus in the lungs, we designed a mucus simulant which emulates this dual nature. While many existing mucus simulants do not target bioadhesion particularly, poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)-based simulants make an exception. Despite their bioadhesion tendency, unlike mucus, they do not gelate. In this study, we added a physical cross-linking agent to PVA in order to add the gelation aspect and to better represent mucous properties. We show that the resultant mucus simulant develops into two regions: a highly sticky region near the surface of a foreign object (we used hydrophobized silicon to mimic the foreign object) and a fluid region far away from that surface. We show that the sticky part can slide past the less sticky part, while the foreign object is stuck to it. However, this mechanism changes with time. At short gelation times, this tendency to separate into two parts is enhanced and the foreign object remains stuck, while the rest of the gel flows. With time, the force required to allow the sticky part to slide over the fluid part is further reduced. However, if the gelation is allowed to proceed for even longer times without disturbance, the force required to slide the two parts past each other increases and the separation between the two parts is inhibited. The hydrogel becomes a sticky goo, which requires a higher force to move or unclog if placed in a duct (much like what happens with mucus in the tracheal duct). We explain the physics of our findings in terms of a competition between the tendency of the polymer to form a gel network and the tendency of the polymer to adsorb onto the foreign object.

Mucus is a critical part of the human body’s immune system that traps and carries away various particulates such as anthropogenic pollutants, pollen, viruses, etc. Various synthetic hydrogels have been developed to mimic mucus, using different polymers as their backbones. Common to these simulants is a three-dimensional gel network that is physically crosslinked and is capable of loosely entrapping water within. Two of the challenges in mimicking mucus using synthetic hydrogels include the need to mimic the rheological properties of the mucus and its ability to capture particulates (its adhesion mechanism). In this paper, we review the existing mucus simulants and discuss their rheological, adhesive, and tribological properties. We show that most, but not all, simulants indeed mimic the rheological properties of the mucus; like mucus, most hydrogel mucus simulants reviewed here demonstrated a higher storage modulus than its loss modulus, and their values are in the range of that found in mucus. However, only one mimics the adhesive properties of the mucus (which are critical for the ability of mucus to capture particulates), Polyvinyl alcohol–Borax hydrogel.

Mucus is a critical part of the human body’s immune system which traps and carries away various particulates such as anthropogenic pollutants, pollen, viruses etc. Various synthetic hydrogels have been developed to mimic mucus, using different polymers as their backbones. Common to these simulants is a three-dimensional gel network which is physically crosslinked and is capable of loosely entrapping water within. Two of the challenges in mimicking mucus using synthetic hydrogels include the need to mimic the rheological properties of the mucus and its ability to capture particulates (its adhesion mechanism). In this paper, we review the existing mucus simulants and discuss their rheological, adhesive and tribological properties. We show that most, but not all, simulants indeed mimic the rheological properties of the mucus but only one mimics the ability of mucus to capture particulates.

No abstract