Non-Fungible Token (NFT) is a new digital platform that helps artists empower their work with easy access and secure tools and methods that can be used easily. The problem is how is the legal protection of NFT technology as an intellectual work identity? How is the NFT form a solution in protecting Indonesia’s intellectual property rights in a review of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright? The research method uses a juridical-empirical approach. By using primary and secondary legal materials obtained from literature and field studies by means of observation and interviews. The results of research on legal protection of NFT technology as the identity of intellectual works explain that in Indonesia itself there are no specific regulations that strictly regulate NFT as objects of legal protection, considering that NFTs are born through a process of creation (which is followed up with conversion/printing) where NFT is basically electronic data. NFTs become objects of digital artwork so that NFTs can be categorized as creations in accordance with the provisions of Article 1 Number 3 of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning the Copyright Act and regulated in the provisions of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronics, and Regulations Government Number 71 of 2019 concerning Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions. The NFT form can be a solution in protecting Intellectual Property Rights in Indonesia when viewed from Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright that the certainty of ownership rights in every digital artwork which is then converted into NFT has its own code or token. In addition, this form will be difficult to imitate from various forms of plagiarism in intellectual property. ___ Referensi Buku dengan penulis: Ramli, Ahmad M. (2010). Cyber Law dan Haki dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama. Saidin. (2015). Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Intellectual Property Rights). Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada. Sari, I. N., dan Putranto, W. A. (2023). Perlindungan Arsip Vital dan Penanganan Arsip Pascabencana. Yogyakarta: UGM Press. Soekanto, Soerjono., dan Mamudji, Sri. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT Radja Grafindo Persada. Artikel jurnal: Adinata, M. R., dan Hapsari, R. A. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap Masyarakat yang Melakukan Fintech Peer-To-Peer Lending atau Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi (LPMUBTI) Dalam sebuah Aplikasi Pinjaman Online (Julo)(Studi Penelitian: Otoritas Jasa. Case Law, 4(1), 21-38. Benuf, K., dan Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20-33. Dewi, Ni Kadek Risma Setya Cahyani, dan Sukihana, Ida Ayu. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Karya Seni Dalam Bentuk Non-Fungible Token (NFT). Jurnal Kertha Wijaya, 11(4), 906–918. Gidete, B. B., Amirulloh, M., dan Ramli, T. S. (2022). Pelindungan Hukum atas Pelanggaran Hak Cipta pada Karya Seni yang dijadikan Karya Non Fungible Token (NFT) pada Era Ekonomi Digital. Jurnal Fundamental Justice, 1-18. Hariri, M. R., Ramli, A. M., dan Ramli, T. S. (2023). Tinjauan Hukum Praktik Komersialisasi Lagu dan/atau Musik Melalui Non-Fungible Token (NFT) Oleh Para Musisi di Indonesia. COMSERVA Indonesian Jurnal of Community Services and Development, 2(11), 2645-2657. Lubis, U. S. (2020). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Objek Wakaf. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 1(1), 31-38. Manurung, P., dan Angelita, E. (2013). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Cipta Atas Karya Cipta Digital di Indonesia. Premise Law Journal, 1(2), 1-19. Noor, M. U. (2021). NFT (Non-Fungible Token): Masa Depan Arsip Digital? Atau Hanya Sekedar Buble?. Pustakaloka, 13(2), 223-234. Purwanda, S. (2022). Hilangnya Hak Eksklusif Tanaman Rempah Asli Indonesia. Pangadereng: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 8(1), 137-152. Saroh, S., Achmad, L. I., Hamdan’Ainulyaqin, M., dan Edy, S. (2023). Analisis Transaksi Digital Non Fungible Token (NFT), Sebagai Instrumen Investasi dan Jual Beli Aset Virtual Menurut Perspektif Ekonomi Islam (Studi Transaksi Digital Virtual Asset NFT pada Platform OpenSea. io). Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 9(1), 378-386. Sudjana, S. (2022). Efektivitas Penanggulangan Pembajakan Karya Cipta Dalam Perspektif Sistem Hukum. Res Nullius Law Journal, 4(1), 77-99. Sulistianingsih, D., dan Kinanti, A. K. (2022). Hak Karya Cipta Non-Fungible Token (NFT) Dalam Sudut Pandang Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Krtha Bhayangkara, 16(1), 197-206. Wang, Q., Li, R., Wang, Q., dan Chen, S. (2021). Non-Fungible Token (NFT): Overview, Evaluation, Opportunities and Challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.07447. Wiradirja, I. R. (2013). Pelanggaran Hak Moral Atas Karya Cipta Dalam Penerbitan Elektronik. LITIGASI, 14(1), 1662-1697.

Crime is an act that is prohibited by law and whoever does something that violates the law will be punished. In addition, crime is also a form of violation of social rules. Violations determined within the limits of values upheld in a society, including the Crime of Embezzlement. The problem in this research is the criminal responsibility for the perpetrators of the crime of embezzlement of money committed by the State Civil Apparatus based on Decision Number: 83/Pid.B/2021/PN Kbu and the factors considered by the judge to provide criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of the crime of embezzlement of money committed by State Civil Apparatus based on Decision Number: 83/Pid.B/2021/PN Kbu. The research method used is the Normative Research Method. The crime of embezzlement is embezzlement which means having goods or something that is owned by someone else but the act is not a crime

Tindak Pidana merupakan perbuatan yang dilarang oleh Undang-Undang dan barang siapa yang melakukan sesuatu perbuatan yang melanggar Undang-Undang maka ia akan dihukum. Selain itu Tindak Pidana juga merupakan suatu bentuk dari pelanggaran kaidah sosial. Pelanggaran ditentukan dalam batas nilai-nilai yang dijunjung tinggi pada suatu masyarakat, termasuk Tindak Pidana Penggelapan. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap pelaku Tindak Pidana penggelapan uang yang dilakukan oleh Aparatur Sipil Negara berdasarkan Putusan Nomor: 83/Pid.B/2021/PN Kbu dan faktor-faktor pertimbangan Hakim memberikan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku Tindak Pidana penggelapan uang yang dilakukan oleh Aparatur Sipil Negara berdasarkan Putusan Nomor: 83/Pid.B/2021/PN Kbu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu Metode Peneltian Normatif. Tindak Pidana Penggelapan adalah penggelapan berarti memiliki barang atau sesuatu yang dimiliki oleh orang lain tetapi tindakannya tersebut bukan suatu kejahatan.

The international community has succeeded in compiling a law of the sea to regulate all forms of use of the sea as well as the benefits of the natural resources contained therein as outlined in the form of an agreement between States as known as United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. The sea is divided into several parts / zones, namely the territorial sea, internal waters, contiguous zones, archipelagic waters, the exclusive economic zone and the high seas. The exclusive economic zone is an area beyond and adjacent to the territorial sea, subject to the specific legal regime established in this Part, under which the rights and jurisdiction of the coastal State and the rights and freedoms of other States are governed by the relevant provisions of this Convention. In the exclusive economic zone, coastal countries have sovereign rights for exploration and exploitation purposes, conservation and management of natural resources, both living and non-living, from the waters above the seabed and from the seabed and the land below and with respect to other activities for the purposes of exploration and economic exploitation of the zone, such as energy production from water, currents and wind; jurisdiction as defined in the relevant provisions of this Convention with respect to the creation and use of artificial islands, installations and structures, marine scientific research and the protection and preservation of the marine environment. Other rights and obligations as defined in this Convention Key words: Exclusive Economic Zone, Sovereign Rights, Jurisdictional Obligations

Accounts payable are part of socio-economic activities that usually occur in the midst of society based on the need to meet household needs or business capital. In carrying out debts, a borrower provides a guarantee such as a land certificate or object with an agreement that has been made. An agreement gives rise to the rights and obligations of the parties. The term guarantee comes from the word guarantee which means responsibility, so that guarantee can be interpreted as a dependent. The research method uses normative and empirical juridical methods. This study aims to find out about the Factors Causing the Occurrence of Debt and Credit Disputes with Guaranteed Land and Buildings and the process of Settlement of Debt and Receivable Disputes with Guaranteed Land and Buildings Based on the Study of Decision Number 62/Pdt.G/2022/PN Tjk