Background: Dental records assume a significant part as these might be utilized in identification of dead or missing humans, as proof in court and in criminological dentistry as discoveries of posthumous assessments are contrasted with antemortem dental evidence that have been well-maintained. Aim: To evaluate the awareness regarding significance of dental records and receptiveness of the practitioner toward maintenance in proper pattern. Method: This cross sectional descriptive was carried out between September and December, 2019 at established dental institution of Lahore. A questionnaire containing 16 close ended question was formulated and distributed to all the participants. We seek approval from ethical committee of Lahore Medical & Dental College. Statistics was investigated through SPSS version 20; Pearson correlation coefficient was utilized. Results: A total of 350 dental practitioners took part in this study, statistics revealed that 68.3 % were familiar with importance of maintaining records. Though 96 % dental professionals record the full name, age and gender of patients, 94% explore medical history, 78% record various developmental dental anomalies and 39 % notice decayed, missed or filled teeth; but in general 55.4% percent maintain the patient-related correspondence. Amongst them 33.5% of dental professionals preserve the dental file, 40% percent conserve the radiographs, 29% photographs of the patients, and just 10% of the dentists preserve the casts. Duration of conserving dental records found inconstant; 40% sustain all the patient-related correspondence for a month or less, 21.20 % for a half year, 18.4 % for a year, 6.4% as long as 5 years and just 1 % for around 10 years. Conclusion: Information and receptiveness of maintaining records among the dental professionals of Lahore is inadequate, improvement can be accomplished by education and training. Keywords: dental records, identification, forensic dentistry, patient chart
OBJECTIVES:
The current study was conducted to analyze immunohistochemical appearance of P53 protein in odontogenic cysts.
METHODOLOGY:
Thirty paraffin blocks of confirmed case were prepared to investigate the immunohistochemical appearance of P53 protein.
RESULTS:
Sixteen out of thirty odontogenic cysts (53.3%) showed P53, four out of ten dentigerous cyst (40%) had P53, twelve out of fifteen odontogenic keratocysts (80%) expressed P53 while none of the five radicular cysts (0%) showed P53 protein.
CONCLUSION:
Reclassification of OKC as keratocystic odontogenic tumor was supported by the present study and its findings.
OBJECTIVES:
The purpose of this study was to verify the association of class attendance percentage, and regular test marks of each taught subject in BDS final year with marks obtained in final examination.
METHODOLOGY:
Class attendance and test performance records of all participants were obtained from the college authority, and the final professional examination marks sheet issued by UHS was obtained from the college office. Potential confounders like age, gender and parents’ occupation were also recorded for each student. Pearson’s correlation coefficient test was applied to verify the association of class attendance and class tests marks percentage for different subjects taught with final marks. Multivariate analysis was undertaken by adjusting for confounders in the model.
RESULTS:
This study found significant correlation between each taught subject class test marks with final marks obtained in each respective subject of the final year. Class attendance of each taught subject had weak, insignificant association with final marks except in one subject i.e., Operative Dentistry.
CONCLUSION:
Class test marks are a stronger predictor of final examination marks than class attendance percentage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.