Background and Objectives: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is linked to obesity. Obesity is associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES). An independent link between pediatric NAFLD and SES has not been elucidated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the distribution of socioeconomic deprivation, measured using an area-level proxy, in pediatric patients with known NAFLD and to determine whether deprivation is associated with liver disease severity. Methods: Retrospective study of patients <21 years with NAFLD, followed from 2009 to 2018. The patients’ addresses were mapped to census tracts, which were then linked to the community deprivation index (CDI; range 0--1, higher values indicating higher deprivation, calculated from six SES-related variables available publicly in US Census databases). Results: Two cohorts were evaluated; 1 with MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) and/or MRE (magnetic resonance elastography) findings indicative of NAFLD (n = 334), and another with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD (n = 245). In the MRI and histology cohorts, the majority were boys (66%), non-Hispanic (77%–78%), severely obese (79%–80%), and publicly insured (55%–56%, respectively). The median CDI for both groups was 0.36 (range 0.15–0.85). In both cohorts, patients living above the median CDI were more likely to be younger at initial presentation, time of MRI, and time of liver biopsy. MRI-measured fat fraction and liver stiffness, as well as histologic characteristics were not different between the high- and low-deprivation groups. Conclusions: Children with NAFLD were found across the spectrum of deprivation. Although children from more deprived neighborhoods present at a younger age, they exhibit the same degree of NAFLD severity as their peers from less deprived areas.

Background: Paediatric non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is highly prevalent among children with obesity. The primary objective of this study was determining whether obesity severity is associated with NAFLD severity. By using paediatric classifications for severe obesity, clinicians may be able to better risk stratify patients, which in turn would guide more effective management and treatment.Methods: Retrospective cohort study including patients followed at Cincinnati Children's Medical Center for NAFLD. Patients were categorized as overweight or class I, II, III obese based on established body mass index (BMI) cut-offs. Liver disease severity was determined using biochemical, imaging (magnetic resonance elastography [MRE]), and histologic evidence of liver injury.Results: Three cohorts were studied individually based on the method used to assess disease severity (biochemical n = 767, imaging n = 366, and histology n = 249). Between the three cohorts, there were significant differences in age, proportion of patients with class II and class III obesity, and serum alanine transaminase (ALT) levels. In the biochemistry cohort, the odds of having ALT > 80 U/L were highest in patients with class III obesity (P = .026). In the imaging cohort, liver stiffness was significantly different between BMI groups of patients (P = .001). In the histology cohort, those with class III obesity had significantly higher odds of NAFLD activity score (NAS) ≥ 5 (P = .012). Discussion:Obesity severity is associated with liver disease severity. Patients with more severe obesity are more likely to have more advanced liver disease, a finding that can assist in risk stratification, as well as monitoring and treatment approaches.

Renal angiomyolipoma (AML) is associated with complex clinical situations such as tumour in a solitary kidney, bilateral, large or multicentric tumours or those associated with tuberous sclerosis (TS) or pregnancy. Management in these situations may be challenging. Fifteen patients (20 kidneys) were admitted with symptomatic AML over last 10 years. Eleven patients had one or the other complicating factor. Ten patients had a tumour of >10 cm, 4 had TS, 5 had multiple and bilateral tumours, 1 patient was pregnant and 1 had a solitary functioning kidney. With the newer imaging modalities correct diagnosis was possible in 12 cases and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was suspected in 3 cases. Selective angioembolization (SAE) was done in 3 patients, which successfully controlled bleeding in all. Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) was performed in 5 patients. Total nephrectomy was done in 4 cases, in 3 due to suspicion of RCC and in 1 due to extensive involvement of the kidney. Three patients with multiple and bilateral tumours were chosen for conservative treatment and none developed recurrence of bleeding on strict follow-up. In a pregnant patient, bleeding was successfully controlled with angioembolization. However, 1 patient with a solitary functioning kidney with large-sized tumour (20 × 18 cm) underwent NSS. In conclusion, the basis of management of AML is preservation of renal tissue, which can be effectively achieved with SAE or NSS. In a solitary functioning kidney, NSS or SAE is the ideal treatment, if feasible. The patients in the TS group are usually more complicated and require life-long follow-up after initial management with NSS or SAE. Pregnant AML patients can be safely managed with SAE. Conservative treatment without any intervention and regular follow-up may be more helpful in some patients with multiple, bilateral extensive tumours.

http://aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2046-2484/video/15-S1-interview-sherman-seth an interview with the author

No abstract