With an increasing number of continental-scale hydrologic models, the
ability to evaluate performance is key to understanding uncertainty in
prediction and making improvements to the model(s). In 2016, the NOAA
National Water Model (NWM) was put into operations to improve the
spatial and temporal resolution of hydrologic prediction in the U.S.
Here, we evaluate the NWM 2.0 historical streamflow record in natural
and controlled basins using the Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency metric
decomposed into relative error, conditional, and unconditional bias.
Each of these is evaluated in the contexts of categorized meteorologic,
landscape, and anthropogenic characteristics to assess model performance
and diagnose error types. Broadly speaking greater rainfall and snow
coverage leads to improved performance while larger potential
evapotranspiration (PET), aridity, and phase correlation reduce
performance. More rainfall and phase correlation reduce overall bias,
while increasing PET, aridity, snow coverage/fraction increase model
bias. With respect to landscape traits, more barren and agricultural
land yeild improved performance while more forest, shrubland, grassland
and imperviousness tend to decrease performance. Lastly, more barren and
herbaceous land tend to decrease bias, while greater imperviousness,
urban, forest, and shrubland cover increase bias. The insights gained
can help identify key hydrological factors in NWM predictions; enforce
the need for regionalized physics and modeling; and help develop hybid
post-processing methods to improve prediction. Finally, we demonstrate
how the NOAA Next Generation Water Resource Modeling Framework can help
reduce the structural bias through the application of heterogenous model
processes and highlight opportunities for ongoing development and
evaluation.
Studies have identified elevation-dependent warming trends, but investigations of such trends in fire danger are absent in the literature. Here, we demonstrate that while there have been widespread increases in fire danger across the mountainous western US from 1979 to 2020, trends were most acute at high-elevation regions above 3000 m. The greatest increase in the number of days conducive to large fires occurred at 2500–3000 m, adding 63 critical fire danger days between 1979 and 2020. This includes 22 critical fire danger days occurring outside the warm season (May–September). Furthermore, our findings indicate increased elevational synchronization of fire danger in western US mountains, which can facilitate increased geographic opportunities for ignitions and fire spread that further complicate fire management operations. We hypothesize that several physical mechanisms underpinned the observed trends, including elevationally disparate impacts of earlier snowmelt, intensified land-atmosphere feedbacks, irrigation, and aerosols, in addition to widespread warming/drying.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.