The source water of a drinking water treatment plant prone to blooms, dominated by potential microcystin-producing cyanobacteria, was monitored for two seasons in 2007-2008. In the 2008 season, the median value for potential microcystin-producing cyanobacterial biovolume was 87% of the total phytoplankton biovolume in the untreated water of the plant. Depth profiles taken above the plant's intake identified three sampling days at high risk for the contamination of the plant's raw water with potentially toxic cyanobacteria. Chlorophyceae and Bacillariophyceae caused false positive values to be generated by the phycocyanin probe when cyanobacteria represented a small fraction of the total phytoplanktonic biovolume present. However, there was little interference with the phycocyanin probe readings by other algal species when potential microcystin-producing cyanobacteria dominated the phytoplankton of the plant's untreated water. A two-tiered method for source water monitoring, using in vivo phycocyanin fluorescence, is proposed based on (1) a significant relationship between in vivo phycocyanin fluorescence and cyanobacterial biovolume and (2) the calculated maximum potential microcystin concentration produced by dominant Microcystis sp. biovolume. This method monitors locally-generated threshold values for cyanobacterial biovolume and microcystin concentrations using in vivo phycocyanin fluorescence.
The shedding of pathogens by infected humans enables the use of sewage monitoring to
conduct wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE). Although most WBE studies use data from
large sewage treatment plants, timely data from smaller catchments are needed for
targeted public health action. Traditional sampling methods, like autosamplers or grab
sampling, are not conducive to quick
ad hoc
deployments and
high-resolution monitoring at these smaller scales. This study develops and validates a
cheap and easily deployable passive sampler unit, made from readily available
consumables, with relevance to the COVID-19 pandemic but with broader use for WBE. We
provide the first evidence that passive samplers can be used to detect SARS-CoV-2 in
wastewater from populations with low prevalence of active COVID-19 infections (0.034 to
0.34 per 10,000), demonstrating their ability for early detection of infections at three
different scales (lot, suburb, and city). A side by side evaluation of passive samplers
(
n
= 245) and traditionally collected wastewater samples
(
n
= 183) verified that the passive samplers were sensitive at
detecting SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater. On all 33 days where we directly compared
traditional and passive sampling techniques, at least one passive sampler was positive
when the average SARS-CoV-2 concentration in the wastewater equaled or exceeded the
quantification limit of 1.8 gene copies per mL (
n
= 7). Moreover, on 13
occasions where wastewater SARS-CoV-2 concentrations were less than 1.8 gene copies per
mL, one or more passive samplers were positive. Finally, there was a statistically
significant (
p
< 0.001) positive relationship between the
concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater and the levels found on the passive samplers,
indicating that with further evaluation, these devices could yield semi-quantitative
results in the future. Passive samplers have the potential for wide use in WBE with
attractive feasibility attributes of cost, ease of deployment at small-scale locations,
and continuous sampling of the wastewater. Further research will focus on the
optimization of laboratory methods including elution and extraction and continued
parallel deployment and evaluations in a variety of settings to inform optimal use in
wastewater surveillance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.