Background Undernutrition continues to be a major public health problem throughout the world. The present study aimed to understand the prevalence and determinants of undernutrition in India and determine what extent it differs by birth order, other child level, maternal and socioeconomic factors.MethodsThis study used information from a total weighted sample of 128859 mothers from India National Family Health Survey 4. Univariate and Multivariate logistic regression were used to investigate the association between undernutrition with birth order, other child level, maternal and socio-economic factors. Three models were constructed for the study, model 1 as univariate, model 2 adjusting with birth order and socioeconomic predictors and model 3 adjusting with all the predictors included in the study. Results The prevalence of stunting, underweight and wasting were 37.9, 34.0 and 20.7 respectively. The mean age of children was 2.4 years (standard deviation 1.3) of which majority were second order birth (33.6%), males (54.5%), anemic (58.9%) and normal birth weight (87.2%). All three models showed that higher birth order was a strong predictor of a child being stunted and underweight after adjusting for potential confounders. Children with lower wealth quintiles, anemia, male, low birth weight and vaginal delivery had higher odds of being stunted, wasted and underweight in model-3 adjusted analysis.Conclusion The findings from this study provide an important interaction between birth order and child undernutrition status in India. However, further longitudinal studies are required to establish such cause-effect relationship between birth order and undernutrition.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.